From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Lilja Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs 23.0.60.1 built today (11th feb 2008) crashes under Vista Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:57:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <47B03F03.2030006@gnu.org> <47B04241.2030308@gnu.org> <47B044EB.9010808@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202770660 15162 80.91.229.12 (11 Feb 2008 22:57:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:57:40 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 11 23:58:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JOhaw-0001l9-3d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:57:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOhaS-0006sg-Sn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:57:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOhaP-0006sa-QK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:57:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JOhaO-0006sH-88 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:57:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JOhaO-0006sE-5G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:57:16 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JOhaN-0002bF-MQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:57:15 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JOhaG-0005M5-3r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:57:08 +0000 Original-Received: from cust.fiber-lan.vnet.lk.85.194.49.108.stunet.se ([85.194.49.108]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:57:08 +0000 Original-Received: from mindcooler by cust.fiber-lan.vnet.lk.85.194.49.108.stunet.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2008 22:57:08 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 32 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cust.fiber-lan.vnet.lk.85.194.49.108.stunet.se User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) In-Reply-To: X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88799 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Eric Lilja >> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:10:52 +0100 >> >> Here we go. Also, this time I added -Q when performing "run" under gdb: >> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. >> 0x77df986b in ?? () >> (gdb) bt >> #0 0x77df986b in ?? () >> #1 0x01080f6b in init_user_info () at w32.c:619 >> #2 0x01083754 in init_environment (argv=0x8828f0) at w32.c:1297 >> #3 0x0100260e in main (argc=2, argv=0x8828f0) at emacs.c:1506 >> (gdb) >> >> At least we have line numbers now. > > Yes. Can you please step into get_sid_sub_authority_count, and see > what happens there? Does it fail to load advapi32.dll, perhaps? Or > does it succeed, but the return value of get_sid_sub_authority_count > is NULL, and then dereferencing it in init_user_info crashes? > > Thanks. > > > I'm doing a fresh build right now (I wonder if I should have disabled the new font backend this time to see what happened, oh well). Could you explain how exactly I would do that in gdb? If I copy the source along with the binaries, will gdb be able to find it and I can put a breakpoint in there? I usually copy what gets put in the directory when I do a make install.