From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: odd lisp/ChangeLog entry Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:44:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1nhcnhtnro.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <200708030125.l731PKiv023152@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1186105360 27371 80.91.229.12 (3 Aug 2007 01:42:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 01:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 03 03:42:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IGmBX-0002VY-KF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 03:42:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IGmBY-000359-8A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:42:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IGmBU-00034x-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:42:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IGmBS-00034l-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:42:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IGmBS-00034i-38 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:42:30 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IGmBQ-000874-LE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:42:28 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IGmDo-0006jp-De; Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:44:56 -0400 X-Spook: SEAL Team 6 BROMURE SDI BLU-114/B kilderkin CIA CID Elvis X-Ran: KRhRcZz\sjDv6Z0ptQg@;e!CM/)4Z8:FLmy`*Ki~{+5D-YcVuES'Mg@PuBxyBLT7H=cXtI X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <200708030125.l731PKiv023152@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Thu, 02 Aug 2007 18:25:20 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:75973 Archived-At: Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > Glenn Morris writes: > > > You seem to be having an identity crisis: > > It's just a way to acknowledge that the change was developed by 2 > persons. Look in the GCC logs, there are a lot of entries like this. Huh. I've just never seen a log entry like this; and am slightly surprised they are considered OK from a legal point of view. > Can you suggesting a better format? No. If you're going to do that, the format seems fine.