From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 22:15:46 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87h7fcnmq0.fsf@posteo.net> <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> <83y28mp0rb.fsf@gnu.org> <51a363db-fde7-791d-cf8d-98ac601d62ee@yandex.ru> <57ca4d78-2339-201d-edce-678c9b003a99@yandex.ru> <01341bd6-b94b-4f94-1461-405e723142ad@yandex.ru> <8735qmjklm.fsf@localhost> <87ilzi86h7.fsf@posteo.net> <875yvh9anq.fsf@posteo.net> <875yvfpip3.fsf@gnus.org> <87ilzedg06.fsf@telefonica.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19418"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 To: =?UTF-8?Q?=c3=93scar_Fuentes?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 05 21:33:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mMxtq-0004rc-OD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 21:33:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57392 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMxtp-0001Yy-Bd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 15:33:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33708) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMxcT-0008IF-2Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 15:15:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::332]:51051) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mMxcN-0007kb-Ah for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 15:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id m2so3085134wmm.0 for ; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 12:15:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LjrhY3a3lfxgHz7uxR1iOt3PNkIGwQpIGza9OhBxmhs=; b=iWpqiwksIhdxRKfH+kbDpheDZd0DiYfXcigPKBYfh2WXEWY+agSFWofZIE0NTEWsr/ 5cjJblHVB+JJuxR2MdYwlxluP8bllK6r//bsYVHBJrC4TZFmAJKyUf8SotzLmqV2vjxy tst+HuSTrLI4NIL496X2X9OieMOJg9UKRJHg1lRwoDYdgd4MH0TpO7CJs4XDKGLeZj6E 3lmtpgqZtd+Km2vAShlDLcdNuxP9S/iG5sNZ7frgsr9bZfLbyWjEElb5V1xbs/s97ccD zUjFP6rvzNlSZoyF2WOB5aJ7+1ciSTXdor+Xz26ukh/czBhobAhBon9bRpcFzb2y/Qbi r2RQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LjrhY3a3lfxgHz7uxR1iOt3PNkIGwQpIGza9OhBxmhs=; b=PYJMkEYru8JByXxMA6E2hQLWLNERlyG2seutf54SDmkMqCq4pZKLJFjVOxaIyWO5L6 fmecfjWGlJuP6sBDXwiADWPgOJdYRFLZXj4mQfDaGFlr55ZEgnwUZrmhCgJ7iEBYWnni CRd4qIyy7CiY/NE18B1AxPxfhTasAIwUHcXE/Xps+TcLhBC2Yg57RlHjsAhp6YPuFBG+ BpmVsQolpmgrm3ri8C+jwMj5bWkq3v5bVmr64E92fo88oIJLeU4Ao90rQAbMPVsMewrM GMqqOh8NzsGrdL72QrSiVIUNxE6mSzPuJtCCUH2hVnaAQlf6BCF0XBfnJU19MP9UguV0 LD4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531FZKR5PymVb91wEAatqJEKGtb2xb9SEFaF/Pvnxu9tlmXnZX30 +0OTTG/5NOKZ6cjMejMPVcHew2IkB64= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQ7r3/z+v57P5LvNYg3dfPvrPkAV0QpAgGwS0wHPnvf28s0eItM4JRAC5F3OMItc83w4KagA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c442:: with SMTP id l2mr8237568wmi.131.1630869348441; Sun, 05 Sep 2021 12:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w9sm5110508wmc.19.2021.09.05.12.15.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Sep 2021 12:15:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ilzedg06.fsf@telefonica.net> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::332; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x332.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -52 X-Spam_score: -5.3 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: (-5.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.832, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:274027 Archived-At: On 05.09.2021 21:38, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Well, it also says that there are as many programmers using tabs as > using spaces, which goes against some asseverations made on this thread. I don't think it says exactly that, though the difference is much less pronounced there that in my previous analysis. Though some previous survey result did say that, see my response here: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20322#137 And the whole thread, if you like. > That's based on a survey made by Stackoverflow, so we can assume that > old farts writing COBOL nine to five at $BIGBANK are not skewing the > results. To try to reconcile this with the main analysis I used (http://sideeffect.kr/popularconvention/#javascript, based on Github code), I can either hypothesize that there is a silent crowd that uses spaces but doesn't participate in surveys, or that people working on closed-source projects use tabs more than the others (?).