From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 15:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <831ro2tqqx.fsf@gnu.org> <4a1fd3f4-df92-c756-9874-4d07b54148ac@yandex.ru> <3bd09dca-dcdc-7569-e5fb-f6b53397af9d@yandex.ru> <83bln6s5on.fsf@gnu.org> <6d43996b-65ab-0bc6-9124-156520396910@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="104865"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Eli Zaretskii , joaotavora@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 03 00:06:19 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0H4-000RAB-Km for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 May 2020 00:06:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57666 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0H3-0007R9-NF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:06:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39302) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0Ex-0005pt-FC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:04:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0Ew-0002mC-By for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:04:06 -0400 Original-Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:36618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jV0E9-0002Ol-57; Sat, 02 May 2020 18:03:18 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 042M3EuZ005046; Sat, 2 May 2020 22:03:14 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=U3Z2GVu87YV/rL5dvbEAjwpC7FRInUjOnbsH0WZJE6k=; b=FYU8mvL+4QKLPeZqaBh080/7NyONanBYyzzYmUT+cgWm3k1aymdd7TtrmL3va9Q9JLBa rdcVSfzbj1ZQrszY2Q1TreYYsr7Zggg3xLVvNq7p/akcJDqYbIEd0Efg1wkImtHqCu60 1/J2KApbGsij2qdFWkSBDThq1HvkqszDOnz3uKP+pitDyBcNACMv5fs0PGOYyx5OleS1 crW5X7Ds55WLIvahNSHW1V/XBQHIOd+B/cT1mzuXhZRa1GtGQpVUpTcZb6jAEL6HLxMZ ycEbH/qv/CJdbY4uUeyjf8CyhG8EkYbisM3CyGT1nFskb7n8QNzv+XINbxPiA4aekaF5 jQ== Original-Received: from userp3030.oracle.com (userp3030.oracle.com [156.151.31.80]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 30s0tm1wa2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 02 May 2020 22:03:14 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 042LrUC3189336; Sat, 2 May 2020 22:03:13 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 30rwystqpv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 02 May 2020 22:03:13 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0014.oracle.com (abhmp0014.oracle.com [141.146.116.20]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 042M3CI9019577; Sat, 2 May 2020 22:03:12 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4993.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9609 signatures=668687 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=18 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005020193 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9609 signatures=668687 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=18 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005020194 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=141.146.126.78; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=aserp2120.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/02 12:49:53 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 141.146.126.78 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248593 Archived-At: > Maybe some years in the future when most of the other string > manipulation functions have been brought into the `string-` > prefix and people got used to expect all string manipulations > to appear there, the case for renaming `concat` will be stronger. If all string manipulations are to have prefix `string-' then I guess you're arguing for that for a function such as `format' too, right? And does string manipulation for this include strings that have particular formats or meanings? Filename-string manipulations (strings, in the end)? Date-string manipulations (strings, in the end)? I'm guessing you'd say "no" for the questions in the last paragraph. (There are a lot of string-manipulation functions. The devil is in the details.)