From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Miles Bader" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Other branches? (was: emacs-unicode-2 branch) Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:40:53 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87slc2ikjo.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <85abyav6wl.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1174268465 16814 80.91.229.12 (19 Mar 2007 01:41:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 01:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "David Kastrup" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 19 02:41:01 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HT6rs-0004yr-Me for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 02:41:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HT6tI-0003vP-Jq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:42:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HT6tE-0003vK-Uz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:42:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HT6tD-0003v8-GN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:42:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HT6tD-0003v5-AF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:42:23 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HT6ro-0005Zu-0e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:40:56 -0400 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so1376885ugf for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:40:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=fl690RRRe8tCAGXxuc25ZlM5A5cihfzo80KkK8MH3h4UhQPehgvFMhf+5r0lrctvRgM4mTfEJn5tRYMRDyj04aNy3LuqqXME53iT0L77hGK5uQY67QTsrFFte92vZE6OAl8kpaDRLRt9K9t1E6pYrOBdB0Y3synGytbFCKPgJbc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=AzHHbpQ12r7msEX8XnYnc958q3ife06AgBqAXTlgVh0m9x36cNJZkBwQgl1JT8pNVV0qh8Rgy8ptzD9giaR5YuXHqCThl6+yKU4mpeM8L4A21uuGwdInWRuiwKCfkt1nFxfHA+4wK9CMa00pOmhCxIkk/d6e7FLdaJB/sFN67dA= Original-Received: by 10.65.204.7 with SMTP id g7mr7896293qbq.1174268453456; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.254.5 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:40:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <85abyav6wl.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: c4176c8fedc66aa1 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68067 Archived-At: On 3/19/07, David Kastrup wrote: > Can we assume that no other branches were affected apaprt from > emacs-unicode-2 and head? ... > After all, we have a number of semi-active branches like emacs-xft (or > something like that), emacs-bidi, emacs-multitty, even > emacs-lexical-something. > > At least for the post-catch 22 branches (maybe xft, more certainly > multitty), it would be somewhat nice to know we have not lost them. [Is multi-tty in the emacs repository now? It used to be external...] I think most of the branches are not very active at all, and there's usually one person that mostly commits to them, so we can just rely on that person to check. The "xft" branch is almost defunct I think, and as far as I know I'm the only person who's committed to it in ages. The "lexical" branch is also mine, so I can verify that. [Of course one more general way would be for someone to use the rsync'd version of the repository to check out copies of the semi-active branches, and check that they're equal to what's in the official repository. I'm not going to do that though...] -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.