From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Miles Bader" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rcirc changes Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:44:12 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87oe192men.fsf@cut.bc.hsia.telus.net> <87k6bv2rlq.fsf@cut.bc.hsia.telus.net> <87zmkqdtyi.fsf@killalla.dreaming> <858xs8wbtk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1140311663 31194 80.91.229.2 (19 Feb 2006 01:14:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 01:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 19 02:14:22 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FAd9Y-0001ga-Pt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 02:14:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FAd9Y-0001oJ-A3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 20:14:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FAcgV-0005fn-4e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:44:19 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FAcgR-0005c4-Is for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:44:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FAcgQ-0005a8-9O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:44:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.200] (helo=nproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FAcm7-0003oJ-1r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:50:07 -0500 Original-Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k26so466841nfc for ; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:44:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fMTSLusZ1qh7yYFRruhMczGWwmrJb+VudPagQIsJy3uBo0TvPVdffIi7RjIPWxf9ZmlJ8aqpFfs1J7EfRszQ9GqjxGH09OAZgEjr83MwhI/VNnmIlmAtiWewc8NmHL3fUlEBpVmjPN1X3Iq97A9MSEVWMe4RWG7ecc7faEQf8QE= Original-Received: by 10.49.8.11 with SMTP id l11mr818079nfi; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:44:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.48.237.13 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:44:12 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "David Kastrup" In-Reply-To: <858xs8wbtk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50741 Archived-At: On 2/19/06, David Kastrup wrote: > > The whole reason _I'm_ using rcirc is because erc seemed like massive > > confusing overkill... :-) I certainly don't want to start using erc > > just because rcirc is missing some minor feature ! > > If all favorite minor features are present, massive overkill is hard > to avoid... I don't think that's a given. What's important is that there be strong guidance to keep the feature-set coherent and easy to use. -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.