From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Scrolling up at the end of the buffer Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:42:25 +0900 Message-ID: References: <436409D3.6040703@student.lu.se> Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1131500685 23669 80.91.229.2 (9 Nov 2005 01:44:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 01:44:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 09 02:44:42 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EZezu-0000op-QG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 02:43:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EZezu-00083P-0V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:43:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EZeyp-0007hh-FW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:42:27 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EZeyo-0007hE-0I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:42:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EZeyn-0007hB-Su for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:42:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.184.193] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EZeyn-0007Wb-SQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:42:25 -0500 Original-Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 67so397628wri for ; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:42:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Fbzz8OQFwBTooVZ5Og6ze/lV2LpmRBfgyqSLCBZ2D+l7SzY67UUhctFT10SvezTGhDXZ8rXQa4c/kTqM2S5Ju99I23pm/CQxM3rHSIFNAko3wWR4fZtKv1YyMztmPNnTbBDeSFtc49TMSBblwk+yGxppniTVdRYPexBg83+Zldo= Original-Received: by 10.54.104.7 with SMTP id b7mr127996wrc; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 17:42:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.54.159.18 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 17:42:25 -0800 (PST) Original-To: Lennart Borgman In-Reply-To: <436409D3.6040703@student.lu.se> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45609 Archived-At: 2005/10/30, Lennart Borgman : > Scrolling up at the end of a buffer moves the last line up from the > bottom of the screen. It does not seem useful for me. Is this a bug? > This happens if I use for example `scroll-up'. It's the way Emacs works. We like it. Some other editors work differently. Both behaviors have their pros and cons, but there's no particular reason to change Emacs. -miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.