unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Miles Bader <snogglethorpe@gmail.com>
Cc: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: new apropos feature in Emacs-22
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 08:53:45 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc339e4a0511081553n36022ca3n@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m31x1rgvab.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>

So is Luc's belly-aching over apropos actually based on any real data
(users getting confused by apropos behavior)?

The mere presence of potential confusion does not mean that it's
likely to happen in practice.

Given that the current behavior offers a nice advantage -- it supports
both traditional emacs users who might use a regexp, and newbies will
will likely just give a list of plain words, all without an annoying
and confusing proliferation of commands -- it seems to me there needs
to be a good reason to change it, more than just a _potential_ for
confusion.

[If you were to judge Emacs generally on a potential-for-confusion
basis, I think you'd have no alternative but to just toss the whole
thing out and tell users to use pico instead... :-]

-miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-11-08 23:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-11-05  3:15 new apropos feature in Emacs-22 Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-05 10:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-05 15:52   ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-05 16:43     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-05 17:33       ` Drew Adams
2005-11-05 19:46         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-05 20:38           ` Drew Adams
2005-11-05 22:10             ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-05 23:00             ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-05 23:18               ` Lennart Borgman
2005-11-05 23:28                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-05 23:37                   ` Lennart Borgman
2005-11-05 23:31                 ` Drew Adams
2005-11-05 23:36                   ` Drew Adams
2005-11-05 23:39                   ` Lennart Borgman
2005-11-05 23:21               ` Drew Adams
2005-11-06  1:57               ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-06  4:32                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-06  5:36                   ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-06 17:05                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-06 17:22                       ` David Kastrup
2005-11-06 18:43                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-06 18:31                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-06 18:46                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-07  9:45                           ` Alan Mackenzie
2005-11-07 20:43                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-07 20:58                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-07 21:54                         ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-06 20:16                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-06 22:54                         ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-06 18:47                     ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-06 19:19                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-07  7:04                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-07 21:55                       ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-06  9:19                   ` David Kastrup
2005-11-05 17:39       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-06 17:02     ` Stefan Monnier
2005-11-06 17:08       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-06 19:55       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-05 23:43 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-06  0:27   ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-07 15:34     ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-07 17:54       ` Drew Adams
2005-11-07 18:56         ` Stefan Monnier
2005-11-07 19:25           ` Drew Adams
2005-11-07 22:39           ` Lennart Borgman
2005-11-07 20:52         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-07 22:59           ` Drew Adams
2005-11-08  4:47             ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-08  4:58       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-08 12:48         ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-08 23:53           ` Miles Bader [this message]
2005-11-09  0:21             ` Lennart Borgman
2005-11-11  7:42         ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-11  9:29           ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-11 10:57             ` Miles Bader
2005-11-11 16:16               ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-12  3:38               ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-12  3:15           ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-12 17:49             ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-12  3:36           ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-11-12 21:19             ` Juri Linkov
2005-11-14  4:55               ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-15  0:52                 ` Juri Linkov
2005-11-15 23:22                   ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-17  7:38                     ` Juri Linkov
2005-11-17 10:06                       ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-09 23:25       ` Kim F. Storm
2005-11-10  5:44         ` Richard M. Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=fc339e4a0511081553n36022ca3n@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=snogglethorpe@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=miles@gnu.org \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).