From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gcc and inline [was: Re: New function for gdb-ui.el?] Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:19:31 +0900 Message-ID: References: <17247.17729.366833.431749@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20051026150259.GA26307@www.trapp.net> <20051027042243.GA28280@www.trapp.net> <20051028083459.GA3805@www.trapp.net> Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130500587 19775 80.91.229.2 (28 Oct 2005 11:56:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ich@frank-schmitt.net, Eli Zaretskii , nickrob@snap.net.nz, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 28 13:56:15 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVSoa-0002uO-HJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:54:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVSoZ-0000xk-Jx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:54:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EVSGm-0007Jp-Ev for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:19:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EVSGj-0007JB-FH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:19:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVSGj-0007J6-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.184.201] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EVSGj-0004VL-1G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 07:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so236115wra for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:19:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=IIM2cBklorjRiQFWtcSU2361nRSHTiQFL7IhIsiDzzlC6s10Yzg/zrGAYnNyaW6RxrrJS93pkeX4nuwlIXO/6QV+6AB3RBgeYqafj/fih7uLxmTZBsAa6uxAN53MIEi6JK8dfMmMRwpy4RYUqddsbrLitnosGhZW72hU8FZIfpY= Original-Received: by 10.54.148.2 with SMTP id v2mr116876wrd; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:19:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.54.157.10 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 04:19:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: Tomas Zerolo In-Reply-To: <20051028083459.GA3805@www.trapp.net> Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45023 Archived-At: 2005/10/28, Tomas Zerolo : > And my point was that it sometimes doesn't inline where I'd expect it > to -- but its decisions in those cases seem to be better than my > guesses, as far as I have checked. So to me it isn't a bug either I wouldn't worry about it either, unless something in emacs actually breaks ... gcc's inlining behavior does change from time to time, but the maintainers are well aware of the issues, and they've got _much_ more picky users of inline constantly breathing down their necks (like kernel hackers). -miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.