From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: TTY Vertical divider face? Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:09:00 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87zmu07i67.fsf@jurta.org> <877jgroo1i.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1119260797 18153 80.91.229.2 (20 Jun 2005 09:46:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , len@reeltwo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 20 11:46:29 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DkIr9-0002mC-Sv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:46:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DkIxK-0002Uv-JE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:52:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DkIbB-0006HN-Jl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:29:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DkIb7-0006Ez-P3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:29:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DkIb6-00063m-OZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:29:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [64.233.184.196] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DkIJr-0001La-TQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 05:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so60764wri for ; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 02:09:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UXL6VfmI/s093pOGVO6aTFtaBWiuhEAUFCtyh9ncOKlHiE8rLRXjZR15oYvc5D0fCgp9f/WNThECe/dh84YmeKpdsHkHcdBEBxWH4h+B4KgHsNMllsxPYhyGegb7xvrho1Z8yS93gSeNu5E5mLE5cC0FqUKkS8bbiGpB9xbJCOk= Original-Received: by 10.54.59.39 with SMTP id h39mr3377wra; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 02:09:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.54.19.31 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jun 2005 02:09:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39161 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39161 On 6/19/05, Richard Stallman wrote: > > However, on principle it seems wrong to use mode-line-inactive > > directly. There ought to be a separate named face to control this. > > It could default to mode-line-inactive. >=20 > How about adding this face now? >=20 > Please do. I'll do this. What should the face be called? `divider'? `window-divider'?=20 `vertical-divider'? -Miles --=20 Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.