From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Auto-fill-mode bug: unbreakable space lost Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 14:34:33 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87sm2kpw6z.fsf@jurta.org> <200503251723.j2PHNQln009118@beta.mvs.co.il> Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111901944 15497 80.91.229.2 (27 Mar 2005 05:39:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 05:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, ehud@unix.mvs.co.il, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, gaetan.leurent@ens.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 27 07:39:01 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DFQUG-0005en-69 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 07:39:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DFQk5-00087k-KD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:55:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DFQij-0007fk-R5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:53:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DFQie-0007bL-Tr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:53:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DFQie-0007aV-Et for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:53:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.170.199] (helo=rproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DFQPy-0008Mf-At for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 00:34:34 -0500 Original-Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 1so718536rny for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:34:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=SWh2/fWIgf8Fmydb3qiHX2Ms5F3LykuBrmAfiEUeR9KYKWw8/kIcNkPfUbLuVM+huOtXjWVPRx8nvBLRNM2bAcxi6ac5D9xTpHz+UjcutgN0wvMo7Q5VcS90ohspHfB9P70Ku0fRH2bO/qNfyPMg97smXJg1S0+bjqlEbyk3cRo= Original-Received: by 10.38.206.58 with SMTP id d58mr3485182rng; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:34:34 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.54.19.32 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 21:34:33 -0800 (PST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35226 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35226 On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 22:52:47 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote: > I was thinking that C-x 8 is obsolete, but if this is the best way to > do that, maybe it means C-x 8 is not obsolete. What do people think? Why would C-x 8 be obsolete? What has replaced it? The various latin-x input methods are certainly not good replacements, as they're quite a bit more heavyweight and intrusive (my standard input method is set to Japanese, and I often use C-x 8 to enter the odd accented letter or symbol into english text). -miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.