From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Antialiased text on X11 Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 06:40:18 +0900 Message-ID: References: <20050310231530.GH3992@boetes.org> <871xab1u3d.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <423DFE79.2030004@swipnet.se> Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1111787067 8250 80.91.229.2 (25 Mar 2005 21:44:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel Devel , Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 25 22:44:27 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DEwbL-0003Nr-CE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:44:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DEwqu-00008d-4e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:00:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DEwoN-00082Q-Pu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:57:49 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DEwoF-0007xm-Gg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:57:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DEwoF-0007xO-A0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:57:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.184.207] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DEwXS-0007c0-OZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:40:18 -0500 Original-Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so512301wri for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:40:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=m4eR8BeiSnBYRyJVuQZssL+oyNsHEXoqhuPIIK/0epMYuXK+FLaf2fxBfBZkC1s8beOoqVM3xS1jxbe32OhD8TCe7jg2R/7E+M8kXQjueNLerCJj9gScKy+eJFWaP/8lUt4LM971cNHfMkvItQ0da0AwnsnWn53xsTR0B2COSOE= Original-Received: by 10.54.19.2 with SMTP id 2mr484085wrs; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:40:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.54.19.32 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 13:40:18 -0800 (PST) Original-To: "Jan D." In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35167 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35167 On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:50:53 +0100, Jan D. wrote: > > BTW, any time you make a branch tag, it's also good to make a > > corresponding non-branch `base' tag which is the trunk version the > > branch is relative too. > > Thanks for the tip. I notice you've done this, but it seems a bit odd -- For files that you've modified it looks correct, e.g. "src/xdisp.c": XFT_JHD_BRANCH_base: 1.992 XFT_JHD_BRANCH: 1.992.0.2 But for files that you _haven't _ changed, it seems wrong, e.g., "src/editfns.c": XFT_JHD_BRANCH_base: 1.389.0.4 XFT_JHD_BRANCH: 1.389.0.2 The "..._base" tag is branch tag when it shouldn't be. Thanks, -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.