From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 21.4 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:56:02 +0900 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com, miles@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1107821798 6242 80.91.229.2 (8 Feb 2005 00:16:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 00:16:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 08 01:16:37 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyJ2p-00031R-8o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 01:15:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyJH2-0005Cx-V0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:30:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyJEM-0003um-62 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:27:50 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyJD8-0003Ud-W0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:26:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyJD7-0003AQ-Q8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 19:26:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.184.193] (helo=wproxy.gmail.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CyIjb-0001Ho-5b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 18:56:03 -0500 Original-Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so4039wri for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:56:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=FEIWvZe4gLMSYNLq/6Oh0Rnuj30yv5HRLBd1ghVh5zq5mALE0+4Bx5EKLdjc5oNEr9SD0z2Lm2GXeAeaqXE3gxASpi2JWE0PsG+55xC8dZ8ZuomZwa8SbKWlhfCJQKExC8a14WPJLDmYZFYrd7G6LkmdT0wj4ironVIAlpuSsa8= Original-Received: by 10.54.17.72 with SMTP id 72mr11657wrq; Mon, 07 Feb 2005 15:56:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.54.19.70 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Feb 2005 15:56:02 -0800 (PST) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33065 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33065 On Mon, 07 Feb 2005 23:42:12 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > What needs to be done now? ... > d) anybody speculating about version numbers for Emacsen having > internal Unicode representation or multitty support must be gently > but firmly locked into the freezer. The unicode branch itself has such references, e.g. it has ChangeLog files called "ChangeLog.22" to hold unicode-branch-specific changes. I'd suggest renaming these as "ChangeLog.unicode". [Well, probably should do that anyway, regardless of what happens with the version numbers; Handa what do you think? ] -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.