From: Miles Bader <snogglethorpe@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>,
miles@gnu.org
Subject: Re: byte-opt.el addition - optimize list of compile-time constants
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 14:39:05 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc339e4a04120821391d565c0c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878y88ox1k.fsf@codesourcery.com>
> > Note that a possibly safer alternative would be to have the #'
> > reader macro expand into something less ambiguous during compilation
> > (e.g., a special non-interned symbol), which the byte-compiler could
> > then safely interpret inside of constants. This may cause grief for
> > somebody that uses #' in a non-traditional way, and _expects_ to see
> > (function (lambda ...)), but that may be an acceptable price.
>
> I don't think this is any better than saying that function always
> means function, even if not evalled.
I think you're wrong. Special reader macros like #' are a lot less
ambiguous than simple arrangements of ordinary atoms like `function'
and `lambda'.
-Miles
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-09 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-08 9:21 byte-opt.el addition - optimize list of compile-time constants Zack Weinberg
2004-12-08 16:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-08 18:59 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-12-08 19:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-08 19:45 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-12-08 19:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-08 20:14 ` Nick Roberts
2004-12-08 22:47 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-12-08 23:40 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-09 1:20 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-12-09 2:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-09 2:33 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-12-09 2:46 ` Miles Bader
2004-12-09 3:08 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-12-09 3:28 ` Miles Bader
2004-12-09 3:48 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-12-09 4:04 ` Miles Bader
2004-12-09 4:41 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-12-09 4:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-09 5:33 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-12-09 5:39 ` Miles Bader [this message]
2004-12-09 6:49 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-12-09 15:22 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2004-12-10 5:50 ` Richard Stallman
2004-12-09 9:22 ` David Kastrup
2004-12-09 4:54 ` Miles Bader
2004-12-09 9:20 ` David Kastrup
2004-12-09 4:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-09 4:55 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-12-09 5:13 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-12-09 9:10 ` David Kastrup
2004-12-08 19:33 ` Paul Pogonyshev
2004-12-09 10:34 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc339e4a04120821391d565c0c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=snogglethorpe@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).