From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] New package: vc-got Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 16:55:10 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87zgsx7v08.fsf@omarpolo.com> <83y28hsqtg.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuj5spdi.fsf@gnu.org> <5f99f3b1-b1b9-20fa-df12-52eed3fedd3a@yandex.ru> <83sfypsp34.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3941"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 Cc: timo.myyra@bittivirhe.fi, op@omarpolo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 31 16:06:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mL4PQ-0000oJ-Kr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 16:06:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58404 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mL4PP-0002kX-J7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 10:06:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mL4EW-0004lL-Op for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 09:55:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]:41829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mL4EQ-0007zP-RK; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 09:55:23 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id u9so27822670wrg.8; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 06:55:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eIAXzQOFghKFGXSEmw3fIn5lgKEqge9nthvxSWV152k=; b=IGiV/5r1EIYYSpA8RB5oPPkwNQuS4oqvsuQiTuBHusF/UgZ9XFf8CKXiR4/5oTFjkA 6yEJMEES8jBDc/UpWzvcHauMqJLNy7u02lL1Ol8zEK9aMTEE62CUUdgxXTp/RVTB/cF0 fipIWOKgeLHU3CKRwFrYShfhDXDZo8bKkZZkw4ww19hebtD8tqo6ZX3sZaLhuYBW0itk GTIHAkItuMEgSucUmddBrxBAgJ6CZXrljdh5nXwV1iI98Tz2jXHyCN/Eix16VQdF1cRK OLOtc0vMdTlN0LZV6jpbvten9tscstqLtUiQX0u8UvkQRl3xkvVB+u6hEW28lV/AsJ++ kxKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eIAXzQOFghKFGXSEmw3fIn5lgKEqge9nthvxSWV152k=; b=TqjhmqnSGaIoICsOPiVcITr3sknvdGRKsYISuHBK9DHc7WHoSnqwldCAb40ZxJqVmp mpW9W7WbyEXW3RuY1SPpwy95zRF3Chs9M4mnZ1NSg9mF6t2OTZUYPdwOiwHtxEVBOmJh UP8T+MRNBL+Qt6FbOMohwGymrTBgnSwccVrETAYN23CsDqkOGMvZI+SMhDxWtoYnMXZz bpkhm9uNiWGIPy2xaemGdXCTtbpqrTRkQl0eZK7yu1ipaCwZPu7W0JBel096U8PAr38t FIemThnwZEGhpeKP+HdDahJ0TAYjEgKjouaEKOJSzly59sNfPN3AL/GOVxxeFEtaAQKb 0OhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323kPa13Ufno3VNBH8MBW/G/omNMftQ/+gNs0CuWrBuCObe9jIg o0wGAJhmU6Rv8xyo4VhD3ULYIIqNOM8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2mZiQ2SbYEVPGexr4Mp9qOdxzFAD5HWnwwV36cOUSRFTzr0/duRvXVx5DEEVRmyDQDAFlUA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e745:: with SMTP id c5mr30608368wrn.321.1630418112844; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 06:55:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a77sm2681356wmd.31.2021.08.31.06.55.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Aug 2021 06:55:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83sfypsp34.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42e; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -23 X-Spam_score: -2.4 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.932, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273591 Archived-At: On 31.08.2021 16:47, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: op@omarpolo.com, timo.myyra@bittivirhe.fi, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> From: Dmitry Gutov >> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 16:46:05 +0300 >> >> On 31.08.2021 16:41, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >>> So you are saying it doesn't have a place even on ELPA? >> >> Sure it has: the ELPA packages don't have to be 100% practical. > > Really? I'm surprised. Surely even you can agree that criteria for ELPA and core shouldn't be the same. >> If people want to use got, they might enjoy a dedicated VC backend for it. > > So I'm asking if, for the same reason, it could make sense to have it > in core. Aside from "why not?" not being a good reason, since 2697123933e3ac7ed4e21a6d12746a98ed7fa74a vc-responsible-backend iterates through all enabled backends when choosing the "current" one. So the longer we make the list of built-in backends, the more overhead we get on this.