From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Request: add cl-font-lock to Emacs or Elpa Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 10:43:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <56660D97-604F-4C15-8961-D35F07E6F29B@spensertruex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="42743"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Spenser Truex , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel To: Spenser Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 17 18:46:35 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jEGIU-000AzJ-D5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:46:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37816 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEGIT-0005CZ-E0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:46:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51883) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEGHi-0004Mo-8P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:45:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEGHh-0005za-4Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:45:46 -0400 Original-Received: from userp2130.oracle.com ([156.151.31.86]:36142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jEGHg-0005jp-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:45:45 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02HHfQbl121181; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:45:43 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=F5lGa93WruFV7BykRuYpBPsIvmSFYF0kvta/D8vcpDw=; b=Rq7wbRDsDm0QRSbYfemayhFmEuMIId10O/FPdxBn8LVLT/kGEY+tzHQHoHzgeLzO6N/r 6xDqI1w9Q8267gN1ZBK/c9+RTyP1R23+DDxyUU2wZz5c7l1eMRYtQglpn8py/ROBSRC+ 4aPdpOo2FFY94WVJUOHA6542lO6tQftowA7ZULE237FuFK8uykOhDOt8C9YuDEaMrSx/ WVD0/NqHDlk3RNTnUh9PBg2bP8H1LkDJCI8KPAKizIxLXFtQBQpjyNPqMSAM3oBTG+AS U2oiUfkIaGzEbitiMLdX4kC2MgCG/cNGu0ljzor1+EST1hYlqmjxeH2FNr1gKuMlITtS JQ== Original-Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2yrppr6e51-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:45:42 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 02HHKkQW186112; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:43:42 GMT Original-Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2ys8ts8jvb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:43:42 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0005.oracle.com (abhmp0005.oracle.com [141.146.116.11]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 02HHheMe000558; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:43:41 GMT In-Reply-To: <56660D97-604F-4C15-8961-D35F07E6F29B@spensertruex.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.4966.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9563 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=934 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003170069 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9563 signatures=668685 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1011 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=995 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2003170069 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 156.151.31.86 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245561 Archived-At: > > I'd also suggest changing the file name from > > `cl-font-lock.el' to `font-lock-cl.el'. This > > isn't really part of Common Lisp or its > > emulation, and if we get other such code for > > other languages then that would naturally use > > the same convention: `font-lock-.el'. >=20 > We were also asked by Melpa to name change. We are currently doing this. > Currently the Github organization and the package have been renamed. Than= ks! I guess you're saying, by "name change", that the name will become font-lock-cl.el? Another reason not to use prefix `cl-', IMO, is that this is not about emulating Common Lisp features. Font-locking is an Emacs feature.