From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Christian Schlauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Applying file local variables -- why all-or-nothing? Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:29:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: cs-usenet@arcor.de NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187641801 21567 80.91.229.12 (20 Aug 2007 20:30:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 20:30:01 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 20 22:30:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1INDst-0005xc-R8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:30:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INDsu-0006FX-7w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:30:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1INDsl-0006BO-7G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:29:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1INDsj-0006Au-Ku for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:29:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1INDsj-0006Aq-BC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:29:49 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1INDsh-000720-U7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:29:48 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1INDsa-0003b0-1x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:29:40 +0200 Original-Received: from finn.gmane.org ([80.91.229.4]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:29:40 +0200 Original-Received: from cs-usenet by finn.gmane.org with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:29:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 31 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: finn.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76860 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > [Short summary: the choice shouldn't be whether to apply /the local > variables list/ -- it should be whether to apply /those local > variables in the list that may not be safe/.] > > We discussed this whole subject previously. > We probably discussed this particular question; > didn't we? I found two threads on gmane.org: : From: Richard M. Stallman Subject: Risky local variable mechanism Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Date: 2006-01-31 23:09:31 : From: Andrew M. Scott Subject: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Date: 2006-03-08 19:55:59 > If we did, I'd rather not reopen the question. I looked through the first thread and read the second thread completely but didn't see anything related to the current all-or-nothing approach. -- Christian Schlauer