From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gpg-agent support removed?! Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2006 20:58:43 +0900 Message-ID: References: <2cd46e7f0510031250u66ea1349yb437d539ce4027ef@mail.gmail.com> <877j6mg2af.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <873bgo4d0e.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <87r7482tjt.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144497527 30978 80.91.229.2 (8 Apr 2006 11:58:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 11:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 08 13:58:45 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSC5O-0003ut-6n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 13:58:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSC5N-0007A7-Ki for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 07:58:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FSC5A-00078E-R8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 07:58:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FSC59-000781-7K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 07:58:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FSC59-00077y-2I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 07:58:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [221.255.76.220] (helo=localhost) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FSC9I-0006W5-0m; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 08:02:40 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=well-done.deisui.org ident=ueno) by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1FSC5T-0004Fy-BQ; Sat, 08 Apr 2006 20:58:43 +0900 Original-To: Romain Francoise X-Attribution: DU In-Reply-To: <87r7482tjt.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> (Romain Francoise's message of "Sat, 08 Apr 2006 13:30:46 +0200") User-Agent: T-gnus/6.17.4 (based on No Gnus v0.4) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 XEmacs/21.4.16 (i686-pc-linux) MULE X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52539 Archived-At: >>>>> In <87r7482tjt.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> >>>>> Romain Francoise wrote: > > On the other hand, I have many enhancement plans of PGG based on the > > new code such as keysigning features, string-based interface, etc. > However, I think the Emacs trunk isn't the place to test them, at least > at the moment. Yes, I know. However, I'm beginning to think that Gnus CVS is also not the right place to do this because PGG is now used by programs other than Gnus and I have no CVS write access to Gnus CVS. Even for a tiny fix I have to explain the reason and wait for Simon to commit. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno