From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: ndame Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Why is emacs so square?" Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 04:54:34 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8wXYP4GY9hwW-9mYv6_LGMETZ8Vz3Ob1Bec6yh6kPT7yxjTkxA3V6dXY4ELra9tYiJUxJmgXKSIEX4w8HFiPRoeGVSQHDSoBVy1voj1e3Qo=@protonmail.com> Reply-To: ndame Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="86747"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Richard Stallman , Emacs developers To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 15 08:15:40 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jObKm-000MTT-HQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 08:15:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43934 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jObKl-0001pH-F5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 02:15:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55456) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jOa4O-0004p7-3E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:54:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOa4N-0006WH-61 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:54:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail4.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.27]:36807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jOa4M-0006Tx-Uw; Wed, 15 Apr 2020 00:54:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=default; t=1586926477; bh=Uyq960jZMxrnTlgc7IvKFglsws7hW6twO/CCS+LU1DU=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=D7Y1TcRyji8kzCc18CgGHJfUrx9/xp90WwpiNCC011AS+RMiiWHPHbmALRog6ZarV U3446Z6uz4hraanBrpJTr8ZSyWd8u3cP1ZaadJWBh7QmSxr05XCXar65sxcn9fNeg+ DoBleH6Robl7X31Ss9n1CsFDf0Z/6bt9osh7YAcE= In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 185.70.40.27 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 02:12:42 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246984 Archived-At: > Richard Stallman rms@gnu.org writes: > > > Perhaps we should implement a mode that puts cosmetics on Emacs > > Is there any reason not to improve the default look? When people say to me Emacs looks dated I often think the FSF should look f= or a graphics designer to improve the default appearance of Emacs. Perhaps there are some who are sympatethic to the free software cause and t= hey would do it even for free.