From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BZR error! Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:59:33 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87bph96gar.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <20100104.163349.117469617.wl@gnu.org> <20100104.165601.205403382.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262620935 18486 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2010 16:02:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:02:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tassilo@member.fsf.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Werner LEMBERG Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 04 17:02:07 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NRpNe-0002kS-QR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:02:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51348 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRpNe-0008S4-VI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:02:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRpLd-0007Eh-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:00:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRpLZ-0007AR-7h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:00:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60368 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRpLY-0007AI-Ss for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:59:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215]:49032) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NRpLW-0007aK-EU; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 10:59:54 -0500 Original-Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so10444636bwz.26 for ; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 07:59:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=j39Zf5YueVH257n7sIUFgYi0Y2WmH5MML5Lq7Ibw8Lw=; b=rlvgFdpx7xRdqKH3TrcZ1AALBEFd5BtisoerdljEXqwNtqn+POOb2+Kqqx43lWRkt5 3wu/p30kRTyoV9iaN6udZaD0Nyurix+92+Ky95fzo7Ucc9yAUly0eXK7aL5Tul6GA983 yS3TOkt6bRnaG+hXIkFJ+GHmYokVQSP9k8a7w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=NG4woPz5eA/yQFlLvXvJ1TE57VvkT9Jn12pE0Pd1cktrUscP0IhSVUF30gC+aYQYcC k48AmMcHWfzgJ90WJ6CCBYQShYSYqCpyIbyEZ62ikIBv7q7eqKnszXNp7XaJZa41sYn1 iUxKw5HzBcgMBZkc3nyjoKZRb/ocFonhY6cpA= Original-Received: by 10.204.32.204 with SMTP id e12mr7361317bkd.51.1262620793141; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 07:59:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100104.165601.205403382.wl@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119368 Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 16:56, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > I'm not so sure about this... Not so sure about what? That it is not a flaw of Bazaar? Perhaps it could use sftp more efficiently, but I doubt that git over sftp would be much better. > It's a mystery to me why this hasn't been done from day one of Bazaar > support on Savannah. https://savannah.gnu.org/support/index.php?107143 https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?107077 Juanma