From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes? Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 12:43:53 +0100 Message-ID: References: <838wchgais.fsf@gnu.org> <878wchfxcn.fsf@red-bean.com> <874on537yy.fsf@iki.fi> <87my0xega6.fsf@red-bean.com> <87zl4x1qjl.fsf@iki.fi> <87vdflm781.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87iqbl9jkj.fsf@red-bean.com> <873a2pgjtt.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262432676 30507 80.91.229.12 (2 Jan 2010 11:44:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 11:44:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Karl Fogel , Andreas Schwab , "Stephen J. Turnbull" , Teemu Likonen , Eli Zaretskii To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 02 12:44:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NR2PD-0005JI-4H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:44:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51673 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NR2PD-0001e7-JH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 06:44:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NR2P9-0001du-3l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 06:44:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NR2P3-0001a1-Pv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 06:44:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37951 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NR2P3-0001Zr-MK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 06:44:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215]:51002) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NR2P1-0007iS-44; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 06:44:15 -0500 Original-Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so9546406bwz.26 for ; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 03:44:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=NzsAqaKzQyF69EOs97folEpoLNfE5NVkAJRQD2WyTvo=; b=EidKHeOqKUrTzGFE+KhyWMk84+ChaPg6kMvre9lHc0VmK+e+AiCc8FvPLADMGIAyjx NTx0UOFol5dmZM8ND3lVbXhexHsCRPRY5RW9W6nNJe/oLnGl6ouJIMhvgMGPDsn/+v0A 9Qj07U8HKlmGbqgp1Llau5ugQwqfAc5KQV7FA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=kyEx0Kx01zDPdEpg5+jgLUqXBxmtZeYIL1JyKr3CrGrP5GNDhns0Wnpy53bDRTP6wu y1F6KVumd2evAEiBUodtHI1KQv7ZQGvfdUZ55KEm2OzmkAtZJOOBBP8ZKHus9Adv7M3q BoJQaA5dF/hYpyRS41VG2z6nRjonfHMx23Qp4= Original-Received: by 10.204.26.148 with SMTP id e20mr1103965bkc.79.1262432653695; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 03:44:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <873a2pgjtt.fsf@catnip.gol.com> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119271 Archived-At: On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 06:24, Miles Bader wrote: > Yeah, a complex infrastructure just to fix typos in commit messages > seems a bit over the top. Though I agree with you, let's not misrepresent the issue; changing commit messages is not just about typos, but also wrong or misleading information. Juanma