From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes? Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 03:50:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87bphengwq.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87fx6pi6k0.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262400714 9200 80.91.229.12 (2 Jan 2010 02:51:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jan 2010 02:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 02 03:51:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NQu5h-0000k0-Hj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2010 03:51:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58258 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQu5h-0004SS-VO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:51:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQu5c-0004QN-V7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:51:41 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQu5X-0004Kd-NY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:51:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40869 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQu5X-0004KV-7C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:51:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215]:49770) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NQu5W-0004iy-RI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:51:35 -0500 Original-Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so9449640bwz.26 for ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:51:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MmY0TxciX2UyHwy7qE4GapRoWubD+whB1BkT9hWSEa0=; b=vUaTxkXWza0oAtEOuLd7k0HBO8JXNn/U1qAtnikvKb7AYNKstVhQKb6cKwGwjjlFNj PPsUrcwvuJ9CqDrpBY7YXSJYKinJpntkpKc/be6tUgmEvuNRhZ3oA+TUSGJKeT61HzEy i8WOZHiEyevav3BosvbXRg7FVzM9mDTsKl1eA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=siYZY4eurW+Ift3fFCpTgPpoOaJEJZC3acBrUChwAkvjqa2utPzyxMmudUbw73iiLU +vJ6xWXAVagTPpfiLSoBtMkJu3BnicJ2/3kpDVSB7DIispB/HEHGpMrZweRav/CF0kWl WElTU+cJ6VPSmZfTb44M9SsDXbhN1WIIw9cUI= Original-Received: by 10.204.3.152 with SMTP id 24mr2363160bkn.168.1262400679107; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 18:51:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87fx6pi6k0.fsf@telefonica.net> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119247 Archived-At: On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 03:28, =C3=93scar Fuentes wrote: > https://launchpad.net/bzr-loom > > It is underdocumented, but it works AFAIK. You can search the internet > for experiences with it. Yes, I know about loom, though I've not used it. And YES, it is underdocumented :-) AFAICS, looms are similar to colocated branches, but threads are sorted, i.e., they have an order dependency. > OTOH, some people emulate colocated branches with `bzr switch'. The idea > is that you have a checkout for hacking that you bind to wathever branch > you chose to work on. For example, lets suppose that you created your > working checkout with: And, in this case, my-playground would be usually in a runnable state, and "bzr switch ../fix-foo" would only touch the updated files, minimizing recompilation. Right? Neat idea, I'm gonna give it a try. Thanks! Juanma