From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes? Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:41:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87fx6sm8yl.fsf@telefonica.net> <873a2slzrr.fsf@telefonica.net> <83ws03db8v.fsf@gnu.org> <87skarapxo.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262292100 21795 80.91.229.12 (31 Dec 2009 20:41:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 31 21:41:32 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NQRps-0004ol-56 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 21:41:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57489 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQRps-0002ku-N7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:41:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQRpo-0002kk-5D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:41:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQRpj-0002jJ-Df for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:41:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=32795 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQRpj-0002jE-0N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:41:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215]:64939) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NQRpi-0001nD-7m; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:41:22 -0500 Original-Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so9038607bwz.26 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:41:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=dn1OawPZLxR2dkCDvPRWVt+XSEyOAxrIqz3pXXm2gzc=; b=JJRV8qer7H7dD54p6G271YYQ51KBdEQWUs8DGuZosT8n6LS6tQQXTnkaFp71RmBflP XLpK1vvnfsilvsiEQzNA5OhCTHSsJwDhlqw+CqFwuIIvTpxpJNHWjvHinDbTOnaqJdhc KJFerc7rvVytUt9eDVNrqwn6aVvqf3rgwyTZQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=I/EAkFB5fUIkMeaPZNXsTztA0eDIEvuYdgJkLS31npJvBGZYCPRHfIR8CVor8SA6ZC gFoKTSoBXbVh0m0crn4cbzcMYgtuf3XlkY6yealBilh578gHy6PjZOfoq36YhXDun47T FeXnkM2kvEjuzsAjMSB6hzMyAycGmzwMvLp04= Original-Received: by 10.204.3.152 with SMTP id 24mr1583299bkn.168.1262292080100; Thu, 31 Dec 2009 12:41:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87skarapxo.fsf@red-bean.com> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119174 Archived-At: On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 20:44, Karl Fogel wrote: > I've never used 'bzr rebase', and have no competency to evaluate the > arguments either way here, but... wouldn't something would smell fishy > if rebase were part of our regular workflow? Only if you have a priori bias that rebase smells funny. But anyhow, I don't think anyone is proposing rebase as part of the regular workflow. I wasn't. Juanma