From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Strange message from "bzr pull" Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:19:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <877hs5ogv8.fsf@red-bean.com> <83my11ejmr.fsf@gnu.org> <87aax1mxh6.fsf@red-bean.com> <83hbr9eha3.fsf@gnu.org> <87ws05lhqg.fsf@red-bean.com> <83d41xee5d.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262175669 25351 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2009 12:21:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:21:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 30 13:21:02 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NPxXx-0005XN-5P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:21:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56611 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPxXx-0001cP-9i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:21:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPxXD-0001Tp-2w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:20:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPxX8-0001RA-LL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:20:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46986 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPxX8-0001R4-E6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:20:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215]:45282) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPxX5-0003ts-5V; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:20:07 -0500 Original-Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so8273085bwz.26 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:20:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=J+Vg0smYN0ZwAY21GcU90RieuZehj4SgXg6UbnznxLo=; b=Ti2HF8KpUGD5WbfJlYtC6Xgn/I5SdH0L7+Eii1SdFS4dlMmxDJBDJLK4ftAwUkgC4E SIa899yrVgEC4lXpcrRKaR73/dYaT2RMqE9+p6DEjRefsW56c31ed/H82XzR45lxu10A NBVaCDKOu61KR4xQa8uy/Lrlz+KAfTZAPuVc0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=dQBeOisuiICWXFdPCr1Vze1Svyx76t0BEnUudggVEiyeDwMrtnoHA4e3hQQiD0rhnm fhk/9YDK3zRuoQ9mqHYc29WinXEAnpnK0CLtXwXeEFnmlF9qWgeoREk8YJQiove8gvje vwgJE0I1MMrB1r5V0loOJg7s/F/gzA6NXbBQw= Original-Received: by 10.204.48.144 with SMTP id r16mr8090335bkf.170.1262175604654; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 04:20:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119030 Archived-At: On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 08:02, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > If so, perhaps it's better to say on the wiki that > "bzr update" be always used in trunk/, because it will always work, no > matter if the mirror diverged or not? If you look at the archives of the Bazaar list, there's a thread "bzr pull vs. bzr update" starting on Dec 16 where the issue is discussed (specifically with respect to Emacs and the BzrForEmacsDevs document). Juanma