From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GNU Emacs is on Bazaar now. Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:27:16 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87d4206n80.fsf@canonical.com> <87637qhjqu.fsf@red-bean.com> <87fx6urat1.fsf@telefonica.net> <87oclig1qj.fsf@red-bean.com> <87bphir8s4.fsf@telefonica.net> <87zl52o82l.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87ws06plss.fsf@telefonica.net> <87y6kmo0w7.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87oclipeuj.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262082576 12482 80.91.229.12 (29 Dec 2009 10:29:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 10:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 29 11:29:29 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NPZKP-00064s-5G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:29:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52504 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPZKP-0008Ea-G4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:29:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPZIl-0006xs-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:27:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPZIf-0006rG-PR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:27:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58732 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPZIf-0006qq-DE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:27:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215]:54807) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPZIf-0007WN-5r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 05:27:37 -0500 Original-Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so7668832bwz.26 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 02:27:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xA1q6fcLcUOErVmJ4e8X6PCKAqT8Am+kyS6ZcLBCxmw=; b=LMnSS10FQvk6MldzGFyTHqQ9x2khE47wKwCLKGMZAJ+lNuPlOVAn63m2sczq9iDGVI v7h+Rb+6+OE22M1dcufRXDfgEZ9Mz7ca0N0TEvNw8tjkhjOTdQbkCa9j4E1D5Gs3ibvp v0qtniNWSA5HbWrQazedNWRHJ8/swxkjHXH7U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uTQ1QXL25WbDs5yH2bIYG+KWlmLikwOdAP9G4E2F7QXCAd91C0YxjTtjZW7W3vUCw8 kNSKxsjWCeiVp2LFsTssxBYGX3CXQjxlTWbEPmzgu2KHpkInlYuiBy+cAt0KfKZwMGQf PwP4tRpUhhJuhZHei2k5Jgo8BsLVD1Hr3zJeA= Original-Received: by 10.204.15.24 with SMTP id i24mr4948537bka.2.1262082456213; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 02:27:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87oclipeuj.fsf@telefonica.net> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118925 Archived-At: On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 05:46, =C3=93scar Fuentes wrote: > Personally, if I were a hacker doing quick contributions to emacs (the > sort of thing that ends on one single commit), I would use the > centralized workflow. And you would likely get some heat the nth time that you accidentally committed half-done changes, incomplete changelog entries, partial commits, etc. All the things that you can do in your local, non-bound branch and then fix at your own pace before sending it upstream. At least, I would (receive the heat, I mean, because I would likely do these mistakes). I know that I'm not saying anything that you don't know; also that you've insisted that we're developing Emacs, not creating the best-looking commit log ever. But it seems best to start recommending safer, cleaner practices. People who knows better, knows enough to bypass the recommendations. Juanma