From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ignoring autoloads in preloaded files on Windows Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:35:47 +0200 Message-ID: References: <831vlbln4t.fsf@gnu.org> <83pr8vjsne.fsf@gnu.org> <78tyy7ymmw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <24aazyzmf8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1255232191 11611 80.91.229.12 (11 Oct 2009 03:36:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 03:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 11 05:36:21 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MwpEK-0006dS-Bb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 05:36:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49561 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MwpEJ-0007qV-At for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:36:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MwpED-0007nY-Li for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:36:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MwpEB-0007lT-IG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:36:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50326 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MwpEB-0007lQ-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:36:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:4594) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MwpE9-0007ft-DV; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 23:36:09 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so124877fgg.12 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:36:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=T9XwAJb+BX5ihbiUGnVaSp9xQG+1Du5qsQSFr5Wca5k=; b=ajgmZZ5A5ePJCBYbI146/KJlXlGnhGxLNu8UEDXUcJx/vhI9Fc889Z4JV0i8sgP0sa oz2cipQF2SFvSiSMgP7aXT2t32pI9E+Gy8JE7VajQbibAomo7u5Cu47udf/EZ7I36GM4 SHwsspO3va3rQEX0/HlR78cbj/O+f9P/ol42A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=fES4jrUVZnj2mm2K0mx6GvENns8bfLQqdt8UI65qtVKzEafMcarVPRFaO9oqJ5MWLT r+Rm7qvnhLcSc2ALm3Vg+gRzfQFmyZ+/vqJi7NPAIjhNpG1q5rZmwKjh9rYfhuUI1/+x wUl0SHWIrMQDZp44k9l1zUUB82KTEr9y1XdUs= Original-Received: by 10.239.182.158 with SMTP id q30mr278427hbg.23.1255232167170; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:36:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <24aazyzmf8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116080 Archived-At: On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 04:36, Glenn Morris wrote: > Oh, whoops. Revised patch for lisp/makefile.w32-in follows. OK, I'll retest again tomorrow. > I'm doing it this way because: > > i) I have no idea how to quote a setting of autoload-make-program > inside the --eval expression on Windows. That should be DQUOTE, as in --eval $(ARGQUOTE)(setq generate-autoload-cookie $(DQUOTE);;;###mh-autoload$(DQUOTE))$(ARGQUOTE) IIUC what you're asking. > ii) Since $(MAKE) could be a full path to make, I can only presume it > could be subject to the same munging issue as described for > generated-autoload-file in the doc of w32-batch-update. That comment is Eli's, so I suppose he can shed some light about what kind of munging can be expected. > PS I can't help thinking that it looks like it would be simpler to > just parse the generated lib-src Makefile on Windows in a similar way > to that in which the Unix is currently parsed. AFAICS, it just goes through the lisp= macro. How does it deal with (MOUSE|TOOLTIP|MSDOS|WINNT|WINDOW|NS)_SUPPORT? Juanma