From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lock mechanism like in desktop.el Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:46:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87r5v7lpzj.fsf@jidanni.org> <87tyzw12p0.fsf@uwo.ca> <871vmthodp.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk> <87ab1h7k0z.fsf_-_@marauder.physik.uni-ulm.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251679627 6745 80.91.229.12 (31 Aug 2009 00:47:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 31 02:47:00 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Mhv2y-0001aX-4m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:47:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58103 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mhv2x-0005WX-IR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:46:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mhv2s-0005WG-Nm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:46:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Mhv2o-0005O2-6c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:46:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43338 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mhv2o-0005Nz-3R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:46:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com ([209.85.219.211]:61758) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mhv2n-0001JQ-Gr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:46:49 -0400 Original-Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so3474558ewy.31 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:46:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=cNq4LgLC9VfsmaJChxFu4WQIa+Sc8KaY0bNXzewwywI=; b=tZRrPXnBWyrzD/YfyEQA9TmQb1Mt3Cb18d4mvh0v148YoMUCrDW7UcbQhBByd6pWrE 5Zkkkq6BvVAjswTGV8WT1vv/PyxXv0mK42K2AkEUcfib97R84UfBay7lF8ltXc6uPP1b BXGBWBoGPwRnSsbpgACNRsKfsyE9cnQzILXzs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=hPSVDYhyrbEq6tDobO/z1CIrgB9rtHRb5qYNatY5XcodT6ZxTDvGGphWY0+UPmHHuc Fe+G3Z9UUri4xL647EVTeVRbHAQ3Iw15OeFWt04dGjjHz9uZaPEjFxw9nl172RZSuBYs KZM6WbGw1gcQlThjpRvLHKALNsL9zrKYXb0hg= Original-Received: by 10.211.147.10 with SMTP id z10mr4584600ebn.61.1251679608081; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:46:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:114888 Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 02:38, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Then the answer should be to implement it for w32 rather than to devise > a new scheme. FWIW, I agree, though it is non-trivial because of different semantics (the issue has been discussed a few times, IIRC). But certainly reusing the desktop.el mechanism seems hackish. Juanma