From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.0.60; detect attached file coding system, make emacs crash. Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:01:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <877i51fd95.fsf@redflag-linux.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231938285 9387 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2009 13:04:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Wang Diancheng , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Kenichi Handa" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 14 14:05:56 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LN5Qg-00023C-3u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:05:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38321 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LN5PP-0001Hn-FZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:03:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LN5Nj-0000bD-Te for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:02:04 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LN5Nh-0000Zh-VL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:02:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41406 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LN5Nh-0000ZO-AE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:02:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f13.google.com ([209.85.219.13]:58222) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LN5Ng-00042X-OH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:02:00 -0500 Original-Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so575295ewy.18 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:01:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=0nqwf3HUEYFhNS2zycboHmoJC0qZ0fCwDTguvGj3wHs=; b=uZGg9g9v5rpjoMBZ5IpfneMX+HqEPJCDikgvxlT9bcxp8+92q4ErYHxa7O3YW7qCU3 0WucQcVXtD0S7qZE6JZQKvEvIPxKYwhG9ydx/baVRQtD4QcQXxnPhUkM0tcfNmzioWp7 gGRh59/Vet9WHMl3Vh/L6/ozYSMKAsBQqNDx0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=btu7gL4zalNNzIixS0Hgy0k2Pi62bpEasxOlebJwCRmmrTqmrOx2bhyaJkgyRwCTbX tJm+k366OU2ICGYnRn8vBGXv974/apaUbg3qFr3jy/V0FnJ7NAmmWkI+Zav9be/W0X2F //ejgFd5NhPdJEE9crINiPPF9C8jGzbJTyszU= Original-Received: by 10.210.89.4 with SMTP id m4mr106126ebb.12.1231938118870; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:01:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.210.141.18 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:01:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107847 Archived-At: On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 13:53, Kenichi Handa wrote: Er, you say: > That's not enough. c1 and c2 must be checked here too: > > e[c1] = 1; > o[c2] = 1; and then > "Juanma Barranquero" writes: > >> Don't you need a test also before lines 1605-1606, where c1 and c2 are >> used as array indexes? > > That's not necessary because if c1 and c2 are non-negative, > it is assured that they are byte values; i.e. less than 256. but these lines were 1605-1606... Juanma