From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: proced: ppid of process ID 0 can be 0 Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:41:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <18765.19040.568030.246241@tfkp04.physik.uni-erlangen.de> <18765.29820.997276.703222@tfkp04.physik.uni-erlangen.de> <18765.51840.943986.608296@tfkp04.physik.uni-erlangen.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229942506 3355 80.91.229.12 (22 Dec 2008 10:41:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:41:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Roland.Winkler@physik.uni-erlangen.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 22 11:42:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LEiFK-0003Nv-21 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:42:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60397 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LEiE7-0000j6-IH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:41:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LEiE1-0000iP-K0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:41:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LEiE0-0000i0-PJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:41:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56554 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LEiE0-0000hx-LU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:41:24 -0500 Original-Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.156]:6811) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LEiDz-0005iy-Ea; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:41:23 -0500 Original-Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 34so708427yxf.66 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:41:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=qvWpYpfp2Esf831PakunMZAkv6eIJ9REbbODrwNDp9E=; b=MYEOsxfQyqxYzcKDG19hcTqhlVXgQB7agz8joJtTY60ZbZNjqjwPVGDU863rvW/dRv 9CvfvPe+uE+Pw9cOcM6xBQHvrnjqJEsGplll/tb1Z9IUHiHWSlbqaYwfutgn/dlxjWEh Jx5fnisIrA7jcQ58w3IM/tdhlmomNr8c8iMBc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=sSn8fEcNL3NsiIPRh8VklizWjRUqOBB1s4sXGALf0RHdL5niFlNyPZUe1n5Uk/9VRa aR1dvRVKv7+1foqQ8Q9rSUHxAj/oot/NKC0tpB9HE95OxJbAcmBExr22IzVQbC1Md8zx R+hWXuKpPzFPSvET4TQUYLooB10SMTTmTeecg= Original-Received: by 10.100.151.14 with SMTP id y14mr3709544and.117.1229942482935; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:41:22 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:41:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107175 Archived-At: On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 05:09, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I see no complexity at all. Please tell what is complex about another > primitive. Lines of code, for starters. And the need to document it, even if only in a comment or a docstring. Which is much more worthwhile if the primitive is generally useful. Juanma