From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: proced: ppid of process ID 0 can be 0 Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:02:37 +0100 Message-ID: References: <18765.19040.568030.246241@tfkp04.physik.uni-erlangen.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229807096 25301 80.91.229.12 (20 Dec 2008 21:04:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 21:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Roland Winkler" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 20 22:06:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LE90x-0008Pk-1A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:05:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56612 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LE8zj-0004G1-K9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:04:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LE8y8-0003vP-TB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:02:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LE8y8-0003vD-7T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:02:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57552 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LE8y8-0003v9-2o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:02:40 -0500 Original-Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.170.184]:8786) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LE8y6-0001gD-C7; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:02:38 -0500 Original-Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k32so1146036rnd.7 for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:02:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=QTZJiBkeVeY8xjXOojUwMb7PsaCqHw87RLhA4DV8PMM=; b=fLI4lZqHTKxPK2oDdMsajdX53Dakdys/B1D5NzICuQpQQukv9FPx8FlbPBWWCE1w9p f6aQtIrylWbQ9koQ90+FH5O2SRjFOki5jc/hb8gbm5ZU1UjBeOAXVrll7XdrYJ9s0+g5 QzUE3odsqxXRkJ2JlQ1OjhTWy/lSa8vJESuDY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=lmth/FuBLZof6m3hSdqGIDz0zmNKvW2cFdtwK76uqKSDkfdGuJtWJx0uokipxOTUCK j0cikw5VyycKX1gmUBLSzEthwt9qQMR9T/paNlHxZR4ReIefmKJl9HTR+mzmHOtU/pIA DaUe7d+Ox+e7Yc3xjjbIcT1hwDz4wcl66aSjM= Original-Received: by 10.100.127.15 with SMTP id z15mr3053454anc.10.1229806957639; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:02:37 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:02:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <18765.19040.568030.246241@tfkp04.physik.uni-erlangen.de> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107140 Archived-At: On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 20:41, Roland Winkler wrote: > So maybe for a clear definition of the > ppid attribute returned by system-process-attributes, we could > require that it must be different from pid. I agree. If there were many platforms where ppid can be equal to pid, it would make sense to generalize proced.el, but I don't think that's the case. Juanma