From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms. Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:31:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8763mfsgks.fsf@speer.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227515504 30582 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2008 08:31:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lute Kamstra , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Glenn Morris" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 24 09:32:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L4Ws4-0001SU-LI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:32:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48227 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L4Wqu-0000l9-Jy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:31:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L4Wqq-0000kz-ON for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:31:24 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L4Wqo-0000kj-ME for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:31:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38096 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L4Wqo-0000kg-J1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:31:22 -0500 Original-Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.157]:4306) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L4Wqo-0007dc-Fa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 03:31:22 -0500 Original-Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 34so840312yxf.66 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:31:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=LtjaekJf/NIreUs4fCu3PZ82n8n/HDj8xXcDcd+3BHQ=; b=tmnSC0xpcnvCp6aAw4hETkQTzojxKltaeOHOQK6VlQ1qwREKw0qT+OpXPMaDNRbsCG vjbDJmrZL0gg9Shdhz1QqUL+SIgHTYQxIR9p0umUEMw3yohnNf0y/Pivfqop1zvx8ImF ZlVeqw+KLy4a6IqA9QTLbpkJ9Tyvit3xbc6UI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=lPqBmDO4KGFfoRA4SdMieVf+lcEewFufVUbSeXejF3HF4kDp5rtL0mBLNnPwV/nCs8 5AgLYaBtgE2BUABlL/vybOtDfuzvtIFH85augHi+9fmSqzj6sMyWn58ojy1iKT+vbvin i9Qee5637BYp12hB6qUH1qTdtQ3i+jlxrEhCM= Original-Received: by 10.101.67.11 with SMTP id u11mr1387797ank.88.1227515481029; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:31:21 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:31:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106069 Archived-At: On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 08:52, Glenn Morris wrote: > I was going to say, why should that make a difference - they must all > have come up with ways to do "automatic" syncs by now, or gone crazy. > But in light of recent events, maybe not! :) No, definitely not. :-) > Only if it causes conflicts. I doubt there are many people with lots > of uncommitted changes to doc-strings (or close by). The problem there is that "Close by" can be anything... Juanma