From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: files.el: Patch to make project-settings optional/customizable Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:45:41 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5f0ff9220811130629t505badf9kb1bcc380df89a08f@mail.gmail.com> <87ej13h73g.fsf@jurta.org> <200811222020.mAMKKBcY020496@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <87zljrm7yh.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <200811230810.mAN8A6fp022636@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <87ljvayb18.fsf@jurta.org> <200811231210.mANCAEv7023193@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200811231716.mANHGBbj023513@mothra.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227462358 1236 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2008 17:45:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , Tom Tromey , emacs-devel@gnu.org, "T.V. Raman" To: "Dan Nicolaescu" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 23 18:47:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L4J2x-0003ZS-IK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:46:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38899 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L4J1o-0000WN-7n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:45:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L4J1k-0000WG-Ea for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:45:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L4J1j-0000W2-0C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:45:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43602 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L4J1i-0000Vz-UB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:45:42 -0500 Original-Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.158]:31599) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L4J1i-0005xX-On for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:45:42 -0500 Original-Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 34so761402yxf.66 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:45:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=DSPOGksOf+cJJA7zvJ2XWdUXzexC+WFXnwmK0CnaJf0=; b=YNXZSxgnWalrte3zKPOHNT6AqpugVLGwsRGYHXHqvOm4L/ICrK4I2pHpZpQiA8IK0n QNkw9IAPednhLRItAddVJtbyXo8WzmO01bO3FOHL+Ji7JWGqqWVs07Eb8RGzoNP2iK4g LHG2h6/317JE8r7kiUmD0p8dS0oW/Qwe7c0RQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=OAXN7/bxQorL1NSeho+dhijTpcKrBEQVWg+yvx/1jN8FXTxsA4J9KYo4vvJB6C1hi+ xu1bR6i/OxmRplks4ILjkXqY9dPqo40fcgNvECaFRegHoFwS5L7ZgKi6kYOfHm70vkqN JNAj6o72Nd4V+3AHAMMCXXhc6yqUoodXFsd2s= Original-Received: by 10.100.126.15 with SMTP id y15mr1176578anc.38.1227462341700; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:45:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 09:45:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200811231716.mANHGBbj023513@mothra.ics.uci.edu> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106040 Archived-At: On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 18:16, Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > And the reason emacs should care about that is... ? Because you're not stopping the user from changing the .dir-settings.el name, just making all the issue more brittle. I thought the reason you insisted on having a hardcoded .dir-settings.el was to protect users. Juanma