From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: files.el: Patch to make project-settings optional/customizable Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:13:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5f0ff9220811130629t505badf9kb1bcc380df89a08f@mail.gmail.com> <87y6zn4pqw.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <200811131607.mADG71u6010167@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200811131619.mADGJukm010206@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <87prkz4kgh.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <200811131728.mADHSH2M010654@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200811131759.mADHxdtU010877@mothra.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1226603619 10283 80.91.229.12 (13 Nov 2008 19:13:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tom Tromey , "T.V. Raman" , Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Dan Nicolaescu" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 13 20:14:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L0heJ-0005nd-Nl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:14:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37285 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L0hdB-0002MQ-Ja for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:13:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L0hd6-0002L9-C5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:13:24 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L0hd5-0002Kc-0e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:13:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58932 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L0hd4-0002KW-TI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:13:22 -0500 Original-Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.158]:2443) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L0hd4-0003mi-QV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:13:22 -0500 Original-Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 9so493510ywk.66 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:13:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=vyGQ+CRidiCKHvIFDFl9yiW3gI8sSnIe0+OZOTA3g4c=; b=d23QMETzK/I+4LSUZSJlkImsRanKjDP6u5y70JRJawFcKHy4ddUcSunq7CJCdGDdns fzKmnR509d2Uf+8MPogIqB8BdFTK/A5xygWt/ckocSCZSwgclQZKSkmleXhEiqsxUJx6 CfO14PiZr2AidT4SQMI0Aema4AdGJ7SFYqxG8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=hOAEtEnDZ2gAZ/sypApRvLeZb9md6eunQd/pr9+htcNWTMflWrWPp3EA8VdzmX586i bHosy/PH4yf9euFzxPfMkswyWR7DQTLzzGExkd0SWxHsdfrQ5qFV6NOzg/1L1hKzRO/S GLr/+/Zc+OWHYsVWWCAs9XSpEcgo/RATgrecY= Original-Received: by 10.100.3.13 with SMTP id 13mr72206anc.26.1226603601861; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:13:21 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:13:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <200811131759.mADHxdtU010877@mothra.ics.uci.edu> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105665 Archived-At: On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 18:59, Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > As Tom said, we've already had this discussion, is there a good reason > to restart it now? Yes. Because you've asked "Then shouldn't we first wait for such people to say that they want such a feature and show us why?" and I've answered. You shouldn't ask if you don't want answers. Juanma