From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs client/server mode hardcodes /tmp path Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:12:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <18695.5574.107271.711561@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <18696.5661.523071.167994@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <18696.11434.978893.578213@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225293218 10104 80.91.229.12 (29 Oct 2008 15:13:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 29 16:14:37 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KvCjx-0007UN-7G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:13:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35837 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KvCiq-0002p3-QP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:12:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KvCik-0002mE-Sr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:12:30 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KvCik-0002lE-Gu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:12:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34224 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KvCik-0002l3-7H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:12:30 -0400 Original-Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.153]:34364) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KvCik-0000tb-37 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:12:30 -0400 Original-Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 9so11835ywk.66 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:12:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=/+5wnN2r2Lgjp3evMMcg+f402BGKGnV3wYr8XF9B22A=; b=neYVJdFwDucnQL9JgdH6MR1mYC2PZd+VpsqfE9Tus9emssmsKA9Li9Bfq2AidFCZIi +1afmN5BgWgViyhtFsm+IR3TeMh37/lfBVoAlzVrdVdBjDc0HNTNS5mr7FmaR5q9mE9q 95LglRM+Blg+38D+y5mdtWsyYfUjxmhVpY0io= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=S+4pRtLzgnutXZ5yaOLC1dayWt9SkuR/ldeguOToVGBI1FLg132QqfO4Ikpo776aiD +YApFUI7IGESp6o7A0nnF5/EsOdtoUhRaDvn2E15ILOINuHSjcJ/Na6lQUZdKVVLRLsk bIja/Emj8Nq3KhRACCL+LqxtWWI+AKTmjOgDU= Original-Received: by 10.100.154.17 with SMTP id b17mr8670970ane.155.1225293148862; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:12:28 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 08:12:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105147 Archived-At: On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 16:03, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Actually 32 is no better than 42 or 100. The important part is that > people shouldn't feel compelled to change 100 to 96 (or 32 to 28) when > they reduce a size by 4. That Ulrich felt the compulsion to change 100 to 96 shows how intuitive is that 100 (or 32, of course). > EXTRA_SPACE sounds fine, OK. Juanma