From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs daemon on win32? Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:05:53 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225224390 30837 80.91.229.12 (28 Oct 2008 20:06:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 20:06:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 28 21:07:32 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KuuqO-0006Z2-A7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:07:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51487 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KuupH-0007Pu-O5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KuupD-0007Pg-FP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:05:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KuupC-0007PI-18 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:05:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50824 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KuupB-0007PF-Qa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:05:57 -0400 Original-Received: from hs-out-0708.google.com ([64.233.178.240]:28825) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kuup8-00082t-Tw; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:05:55 -0400 Original-Received: by hs-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 55so750938hsc.10 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:05:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=YYq4N2ND3Uxd9XcJv2n+FbvZabCN67MIHnPt5LF/v08=; b=Ryy5yzlVD/1bj90VHqIfT9Ft6zyxpVBipu2zodm6BYFWX9h6I4Qy4woLMf0G1uiq8U SJOZplPdDNIMp6l1iPMH2uIhmhbcBPjFTMcgI4wb7XsMzDngyCRb2ZoKtLjL0OglT2JI Vn2Dl8Fh81y0Tjm+2QOKiGDq1DUIgbNrtFoG8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=QiN4MRcwrKD1wn6xy2swUHgHDQKNTmMtFqFj27fFR8QmjYqCTpqsKV6MFyxLoOX5Rd 4qCytWEBtxLcobQA/i+MQYq4GTfiYC8z0B4dVQlQawXSQaMcmK0etoWr0xMjFWCRTe0N HmYycvbYcOacTV2WFRSUfwOkqRK2+YEKrwGXs= Original-Received: by 10.100.108.20 with SMTP id g20mr7602605anc.14.1225224353199; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.100.13.13 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:05:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:105102 Archived-At: On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 19:18, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > That's not --daemon, that's --systray, a different feature which could > be nice for those who, like you, would like Emacs to stay clear of the > desktop. Well, yes, but there seems to be some synergy between both functionalities. > (I don't share that desire, because I more or less live > inside Emacs, and there's too little space for that in that little > systray icon ;-) Yeah, it'd be too crowded. > The reason I asked about the sense of having --daemon on Windows is > because Windows, unlike Posix platforms, is not suited well for remote > logins. I don't see there's a necessary relationship between a daemon and remote logins... Juanma