From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Meanness Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 18:11:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20080726081019.GB1419@muc.de> <853alw3aq8.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217088711 31818 80.91.229.12 (26 Jul 2008 16:11:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "David Kastrup" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 26 18:12:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KMmNp-0005k8-Fx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 18:12:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50207 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KMmMv-0002lt-Ci for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:11:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KMmMq-0002lP-BS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:11:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KMmMn-0002kt-RV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:11:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53430 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KMmMn-0002kq-PM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:11:33 -0400 Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.185]:46151) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KMmMn-0006Ff-7l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 12:11:33 -0400 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c7so7184684nfi.26 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:11:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=xli7MdB6FWD9u8wpc3VnQTV2sl7rQUNbqC6NjJ+60S0=; b=FQMhwgFVjvhWBND0gchqPY61mqrmA25NWazjkFtUzlE/FXX0tVjxW15RAKDmVCrQcv FrhQKFqBzsfk6RphOibKdYguPTmttlwvrrkEGEhUAYhpTEMafPSZ+aHpd59yFN7toUSb zVjhYV9Sicv18qaCgUR+GS1ySGWDsFSFg7E5Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=FB3GYTx8hsoK2lAwSGEu+b9MH+xbV6pJa4UKkPXA7pWJijbbQo3uqnC8ghI+pAxT6y nVtLMEDgKiv6x85nGtiZfvG15S3IN50J2jRSrkrvy6dZKHcvfOAmZx5VKJa7xf7cGUUp K7ePU36WD+V4h65xRkNVPPKeporkr0RR6P76I= Original-Received: by 10.210.27.20 with SMTP id a20mr3509861eba.89.1217088692128; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:11:32 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.210.71.14 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:11:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <853alw3aq8.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101533 Archived-At: On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 17:51, David Kastrup wrote: > I am tired of having all sorts of silly insinuations ascribed to me in > order to have people "win" their arguments. > > We are in disagreement over the relative merit of having Emacs run on > Windows. I don't see why this can only be considered tolerable when one > can prove me to be a blabbering idiot. > > So feel free to disagree with me if you are so inclined, but please > refrain from putting nonsense in my mouth. If you can't justify your > views before yourself and others without resorting to such measures, > this should make you think. Color me puzzled. I agree with what Eli said in response to Alfred M. Szmidt. I particularly agree with this bit I quoted: > We have a common goal here: improving Emacs. Let's not put that goal > in jeopardy by emphasizing minor (yes, minor!) differences between us > on how soon and how completely should each private citizen switch to > using Free Software and Free Software alone. I fail to see how that means that I try to "prove [you] a blabbering idiot", that I "[put] nonsense in [your] mouth" or that I adscribe to you "silly insinuations". Honestly, we've had differences before, but this time I don't know what you're talking about. Juanma