From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: face-remapping-alist client code Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 17:39:07 +0200 Message-ID: References: <611w3gcesf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <005201c8c4bb$aec2f580$0200a8c0@us.oracle.com> <87tzgbzyjq.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87iqwrzwsf.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1212421170 4061 80.91.229.12 (2 Jun 2008 15:39:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 15:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Miles Bader" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 02 17:40:12 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K3C8i-0003xt-Sc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:40:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36215 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K3C7w-00056Y-Ky for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:39:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3C7s-00054e-81 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:39:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K3C7q-00051O-Gs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:39:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46850 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K3C7q-00050u-9G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:39:10 -0400 Original-Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.181]:25729) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K3C7p-0000St-T1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:39:10 -0400 Original-Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so465414pyb.1 for ; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:39:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Ibuu5VUwLmFuW0m1qmaQqubHAUf1FNHPWXZIV+Pf5Lo=; b=TymQyhAYWS3h2+fXo+YMUKwoBG6dC4LLoVEEPzgNboHHVpZQKniREiAj6gNHWLV/IyO8nKDMhO+VW3P3IfWMu8nBWX2H8dyytwQmfSDWf/Aa1Nez1pb5rJUOpFAcDswAtWdNemkuV16hGI1zZkIN7GA7qiEZhM4todH5sesrfQM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kjkBoF0m9YBO0Tg3xU4iWnHb3EvZGS55eC/U9E25FZBtmAx4dwbKZV/4/kb2dppZXBp69HW9G5nsRQ/uARgmAvH1qe2VeDW0cONaTTzgkkFiJ+H0PAere55bULy4550jW8iHftFoVmeSGi7HcDRPMQxXB9wMKKVuIPhfTkHSrUc= Original-Received: by 10.115.76.1 with SMTP id d1mr9758415wal.207.1212421148103; Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.167.17 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jun 2008 08:39:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87iqwrzwsf.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98240 Archived-At: On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Miles Bader wrote: > I somehow got the impression that make-variable-buffer-local was frowned > upon. Dunno if it's true. As David has said, it depends on whether the variable is going to have a sensible default that can be often used without resorting to making it buffer-local. But I think that's not the case here. > I think the lighters are actually quite useful. It's nice to have an > explicit reminders of active modes as well as implicit (and sometimes > subtle) ones. Oh, I think we are on extreme opposites here. I tend to remove lighters, or at the very least reduce them to the minimum possible expression (one-char). Juanma