From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Font selection weirdness Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 13:03:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <483AAED9.20309@gnu.org> <483B1EB3.4020807@gnu.org> <483C3271.1050502@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1211972659 19034 80.91.229.12 (28 May 2008 11:04:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 11:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: "Jason Rumney" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 28 13:05:00 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K1JSU-0004cr-8p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 13:04:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38350 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K1JRj-0006sR-2q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 07:03:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K1JRe-0006sI-3W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 07:03:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K1JRc-0006rz-Hy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 07:03:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44800 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K1JRc-0006rp-A9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 07:03:48 -0400 Original-Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.243]:48060) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K1JRb-0001Ha-TC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 May 2008 07:03:48 -0400 Original-Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id k29so3476020rvb.6 for ; Wed, 28 May 2008 04:03:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=zCzk9t4RQxcJevjqi2FBQgVBxzaZVgH25Fn0VLKby0g=; b=mPrYsat/15EEX/FhiPPQEa3gTMylyweLZlIuVf1Cd6zsj0DR4A7uuORdk5tAk8hZMnx5LD1Lr4Cc6LCSnFBGSWVFbJp97tDTzZ5ZN9Q/PcL03waL/0zQl9pSiNzY3yZZ5P96HoPOO6o33Ct81swd+ebxTUgcZ6apKoOWzs80gN4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ylsjk1Wc6DMJPgJ4peRzEyn+3iLnCAmQRX7ZYbsErwCqTmLuSuwfgAEikLqI7lwT4Dq7KKQ9elod/6OS2Yyu9ok+c/AuiO4e4YgIhlalg9/1BjlPcJrkvcxZXMgbpAwpQlcBBGAQ1H/baVsYNpCUDQ+8oEtXZefoHGxe02MxVH8= Original-Received: by 10.114.95.1 with SMTP id s1mr2308160wab.221.1211972626847; Wed, 28 May 2008 04:03:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.167.17 with HTTP; Wed, 28 May 2008 04:03:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <483C3271.1050502@gnu.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:97888 Archived-At: On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Jason Rumney wrote: > I made a change today that > should mean that the function should never be called on Windows > 2000/XP/Vista, unless there is a bug in the font drawing that continues to > draw after finding the character is not supported, or a buggy truetype font > that uses a glyph index other than 0 to indicate that a character is not > supported. With the current CVS, clear_cached_metrics is being called every time I try to display etc/HELLO on my work computer (it doesn't happen in my laptop, but the installed fonts are quite different). I'll try to debug it to find what's happening. Juanma