From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: function arguments downcased in help buffers Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:33:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200804150020.m3F0KBMo012038@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208226806 7285 80.91.229.12 (15 Apr 2008 02:33:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Glenn Morris" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 15 04:34:02 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jlazd-0007o9-Ot for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 04:33:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jlayz-0002jH-Fw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:33:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jlayu-0002h4-QX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:33:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jlayt-0002f6-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:33:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jlayt-0002f0-9D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.178]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jlays-0005hB-Rz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:33:11 -0400 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so2507943wah.10 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:33:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=dbw35B2jo3Bv7ckqN8P1x0FXgvZbetCNMB35V+zTEWI=; b=TaMnCi9x4Ho/At7/j39IE5+xFPDWVvuUXQTWrtFpG8NpglFd9OYaZOBQm/PsvGASEgjvmtWDOxj1Kujb0ihTjSvvmo0bgoktx9WA5KVoNZf51cYdTHMn5BncfIiog/ds3VDmHdWcX6+QsT9xILZlD3V/cd7i7H6/TVf9FMRGJtE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jZxzdk+2P+riC0UoJpkt8A/yZUuqR/FsYr1hwA/VoSK9574i2pugOcJ9e3Y9o0LRn1+8Xzj5CdYo1L3mjdTVCoWsSJdPw6pVKiM6iYGmMa4TwVFihn03raeaW32SEujK7LIG19lBQE6z2yPgzu28LrJhUlzmrVqzM30uKt2rwYs= Original-Received: by 10.114.197.1 with SMTP id u1mr4471092waf.229.1208226789450; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.114.166.20 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:33:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95236 Archived-At: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 4:04 AM, Glenn Morris wrote: > For me in the current CVS trunk with emacs -Q, they arguments are in > the default face. I don't see that on Windows, with or without the new font backend. After emacs -Q the args are in help-argument-name face, which is italized. > This is another problem of the font-backend, because > with --disable-font-backend the arguments are uppercase once more. I > guess the font-backend gets the `face-differs-from-default-p' > calculation wrong in help-default-arg-highlight. That could be a bug in `face-differs-from-default-p', yes. Juanma