From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs does not listen on w32 Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:17:29 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4800D965.9080202@gmail.com> <480212F7.7090409@gmail.com> <4802249D.2060909@gmail.com> <480271D2.7040304@gmail.com> <4802756C.6000005@gmail.com> <480277F4.3040500@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208121473 31503 80.91.229.12 (13 Apr 2008 21:17:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 21:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , jasonr@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 13 23:18:28 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jl9ad-0007KL-8v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:18:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9Zz-0003c3-1S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:17:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9Zv-0003br-J7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:17:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9Zt-0003bf-Lg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:17:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jl9Zt-0003bc-HW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:17:33 -0400 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.183]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jl9Zt-0006e9-IH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:17:33 -0400 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so1648305wah.10 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:17:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=NPvuzaCo4cx4uSFi1Vp7WPhr7wDlUMhi0te4jydTOFY=; b=bpeZw0isW5MtV4JuuM0zXCG2JeJFAz9P+wBn36LP+SBNFOtF6pv5o4tkaiv1f18frOosQ0TtNQor7+/JDCqXQgAlDwS7WMBvss+QE1stRUklhpS5qibC1XJZ2QcDGDKFx7lpU+TyUGayeZ52Rqt9KqQxkKpxzKqB5ENVQBqjhxs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bxZ/GXgR7A7S67GmdKcI9+osjUfbcMSnkuPTGXJ63He6B2Xe9fwD1G36+O2+4mF3RGkSiaAyO7HoPd0LXUD2KMGFG1vxysLzT9v0i9N3psEBqdBJQl6RU6qmacDTL6eyUEERLC8rAYPMlt5vyB/SrbcSovAiAOo1S8Sq0aQkvLc= Original-Received: by 10.114.78.1 with SMTP id a1mr6079833wab.104.1208121449931; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:17:29 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.115.72.13 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:17:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <480277F4.3040500@gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95130 Archived-At: On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote: > I do not know what can be done in those circumstances, but I guess that the > window and message framework is still there. (This depends on exactly how > the exit is implemented.) In that case I would think it is best to interrupt > that loop to. You have not yet answered my previous question: how do you differentiate between useful work, and looping forever? With a timeout? Juanma