From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Assertion failes in w32uniscribe.c Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 12:37:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <47F4F272.8050204@gnu.org> <47F5E34B.9040207@gnu.org> <47F602F6.2050309@gnu.org> <47F823FD.6050908@gnu.org> <47F8D363.9030701@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1207564711 7289 80.91.229.12 (7 Apr 2008 10:38:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 10:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: "Jason Rumney" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 07 12:39:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jiokh-0005GG-4a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 12:39:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jiok3-0006Zp-MY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:38:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jiojb-0006Vk-Gl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:37:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JiojY-0006Tx-Be for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:37:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JiojX-0006TC-A2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:37:51 -0400 Original-Received: from el-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.162.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JiojW-0005j9-VI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:37:51 -0400 Original-Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n30so1126991elf.7 for ; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 03:37:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=M3aqrshzKXTsb6dAx7HlKKQWIa7YkUQkDd8TkVtB9ZM=; b=Az0GtBzPom6JJemfMQAKGF/NRd4gsKDcyWOaX0pbdv0IwousDAi9QGzW5iLoeHFi5WEjjqls5X9XXUpp+RKaCBHlVdtYSIY/Tlsw2s/seD8NCINrhXjSOwQVdIquE+OT/pz02Bqd96+LTbaReLaK1BRQ2meowUobCTxfz6duso8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=t7qiyT4jjq/s/O0G82UrHJQJZ7Cf4DRZUiRRZGotii0+gDhaDGlb4DwqJSZUr28QLAC06R7DEgl0PpjQVJOWAC7qmwG44db5IUFYc/09nKDiTmXv7JRpTN0CEPiMYrT3+39RsnfSG3CeVdV1r7rrJ7hQtzN+BJ/vD8juO2NM134= Original-Received: by 10.115.14.1 with SMTP id r1mr5721999wai.97.1207564645462; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 03:37:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.115.72.13 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 03:37:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <47F8D363.9030701@gnu.org> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:94560 Archived-At: On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Jason Rumney wrote: > C-v in a buffer viewing etc/NEWS is near instantaneous for me, so I think > you'll need to debug why it is taking so long on your machine. I'm not talking about C-v. I'm talking about scrolling one line at a time. I use this in my .emacs (setq scroll-preserve-screen-position 'always scroll-conservatively most-positive-fixnum scroll-step 0) because I *hate* recentering during scroll. If you try the above setup with and without the new backend, you'll see the difference, I think. Juanma