From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS file Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 02:43:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <18375.18663.981150.252393@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85hcfi28n2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <47D18DBF.5020302@emf.net> <47D1F997.6030303@emf.net> <47D202B3.8020503@emf.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204940619 6215 80.91.229.12 (8 Mar 2008 01:43:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 01:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, jeremy@jeremyms.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Thomas Lord" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 08 02:44:05 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JXo6W-0003eZ-WD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 02:44:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXo5z-0003cA-9t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:43:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXo5u-0003a4-Jx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:43:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXo5s-0003ZX-3h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:43:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXo5r-0003ZU-TN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:43:23 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXo5r-0005pc-NV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:43:23 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so887961wah.10 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:43:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=iF9eA1KRKKOfzcSsP+qAwe3IvZWzAN0tEgw8noRhC18=; b=Hf5+EMQtcP/TE8uKcGR4Q7w6eIzM/XNN3c3GYDlhHUAjxh5UBgXzSGnjXorBHu2WT2RnZrd/ROyjC+wD0gXGGrxBwu8lyyZc1dN9Rj9VkrsYPZ7l3MfdQiSRDMDcQwZSl94NqP5yTRDk6i+fCxmG1tyj2w6/YDlgfqjbVRocpxA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FQLlzMeL8729XpMl9vtYsI9nChphAMkXXTzjGxnNgCWOzCVQiS0VeOf3ODx8BmKbCpBxcU2bPgxA47UJFEHThVmiV6nz8ZBHa36F5XeeU8FODifvAaqdgmyn9a9ofR+7R/6/ApRNXvxhl+ydPCW6kgclDeYG2edNIUO/ll++ZiU= Original-Received: by 10.141.74.17 with SMTP id b17mr1269409rvl.113.1204940602177; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:43:22 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.166.20 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:43:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <47D202B3.8020503@emf.net> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91688 Archived-At: On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 4:06 AM, Thomas Lord wrote: > So, one or both of us should probably get rightly flamed soon > for being too off-topic or not trimming CC's or something > but I'll risk at least one more round: Your analysis of the GNU project's failure to "organize software tools into larger systems" (to quote your words) is very interesting. But now we're straying too far from the current topic. I'll stop here. I think we've discussed enough; let's avoid the flames ;-) Many thanks for your comments. Juanma