From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS file Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 18:01:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <18375.18663.981150.252393@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87od9wt19m.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> <87tzjnvjhc.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204563989 12746 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2008 17:06:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 17:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Karl Fogel" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 03 18:06:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWE71-0007j7-T9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:06:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWE6U-0001Xh-Mf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:05:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWE2Q-0006K9-5W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:01:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWE2N-0006Ii-Kb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:01:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWE2M-0006IY-Rs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:01:15 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWE2M-0007lJ-Gu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 12:01:14 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so149326wah.10 for ; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:01:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=kboPqGsWq3YdMkcMmZ1mMY6CD2u6/s9q9WZ0Bq/9fX8=; b=p8aflseT3C4chnpnUnXKrIp1b8iA4GC1TO2883bFGBXDnEM0Q2fr5G4bPl147aKRQcWbiIpWn/F4n1ybRfSINXTpw/HX6mMOUn0vTOXPKatFtKtKxZgjdk5lHjAw7Xm3zQ4CfWQa/KObHkmF+Qkosop86xeYSJaPjyJoGrqy5bs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=egPVwyQ6Zj/ftgR5mCDsIL55JFX88zkIEYeBUa/m/QI1y/9lDMzGid4AKf14mLMSw+DnRCXwJ0zwQ4fP22amJmgayzu/v1QA7uA8sHf5wcb84UfPR6deewVxUquLa1kh1Jbg8IuuBVVy8Ga3psED9gpcegfXR7pdoqMRFHpbE0I= Original-Received: by 10.114.12.9 with SMTP id 9mr316834wal.23.1204563671439; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 09:01:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.115.72.13 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:01:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87tzjnvjhc.fsf@red-bean.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91189 Archived-At: On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Karl Fogel wrote: > Please, yes :-). Stefan's right, it doesn't really matter, any of the > distributed VCSs will be good for the Emacs team. Well, I mostly agree. I have no axe to grind, dVCS-wise. My "axe" is more towards the tool being somewhat Windows-friendly. I know that most, if not all of them, run on Windows; I've tried bazaar, git, mercurial and darcs. I'm more worried about CRLF conversion issues (AFAIK, bazaar has no support for automatic conversion, but I'd love to be wrong about it) and whether ssh or other authentication methods for write access are available on the Windows ports. > (Note: I'm a Subversion developer, but agree that a distributed system > will be better for this particular development community.) I think we know who you are, Karl ;-) Juanma