From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 22.1.90; desktop-save throws (error "No buffer named ") Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:17:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <92ve4aefit.fsf@nospam.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204150680 30922 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2008 22:18:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 22:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Martin Fischer , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 23:18:25 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JUUbJ-0006c6-8A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:18:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUUam-0002lq-Pd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:17:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUUai-0002lM-EM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:17:32 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUUah-0002l7-6z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:17:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUUah-0002l4-4v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:17:31 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.183]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUUag-0007Dn-RS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:17:31 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so3934126wah.10 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:17:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=E1fNVnhPBGVhSd62//TlydRCbHcEzgUyVfubRlWN2ik=; b=a0Z2Ibeh13fAEjxWJs1zrqiMmeGJ9CzKiLbN8x6o6KVOZNmY6ym5iBnDEBQhk/DimdX3OarD6Ak1iunwQy5xXzTsn56jgMM+FRYh23k8q8Kx3PNlWFLpxk4Pf4Sd2ePpGFeeXAM6SJ+bhAb/4gRKYrDURTt+DprEQQeECh56xms= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PhyK1qzcH/gCUmRWsX7/z5lwY8sIMB2IupY0w8lywjIChPnYI+i15pAHUb0u7Pfp4fC1iPqxXr8iNUHJRnLpComEWbbv3mG+w99FrE10pTwOfZtyFRy2esYCfSSIqhRr5MpNOxqB7BcPPD8RYBlfXw4WQlRZlhPdxuDgBRm9MOA= Original-Received: by 10.114.150.1 with SMTP id x1mr8186065wad.46.1204150648661; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:17:28 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.115.72.13 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:17:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90655 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21322 Archived-At: > Hmm... but then that doesn't seem to agree with the docstring: > the buffer *is* managed by uniquify, but you return nil. I changed the docstring in the very next commit. > I think the fix should be in desktop. I don't think so. The function is not called uniquify-buffer-managed-by-uniquify-p; it's an function whose whole point is to provide a nicer interface for desktop, and, to desktop, a basename of "" is like having no basename. If we ever find that the function is useful for other packages we can revisit the issue. Juanma