From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs pretest 22.1.91 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:13:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87ejb8vl0i.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <47C17D74.9050204@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203905598 32412 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2008 02:13:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: "Takashi Hiromatsu" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 25 03:13:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JTSqd-0000Nr-2p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 03:13:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JTSq7-00057Q-9E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:13:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JTSq2-00056T-Ee for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:13:06 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JTSq0-00054U-0p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:13:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JTSpz-00054O-Un for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.177]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JTSpz-0003lG-OD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 21:13:03 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so1658382wah.10 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:13:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=c+wYW8cuffnTUOzcicsu2ROH4YVT1k4GLQBo8l6KymQ=; b=LR2knCEdoAx3qM2Z8ztlSPdFm/M+2s4j02hxAAsy5k57hDN2X1OhASY8wLP6QstgvVQecUKUcEdIvU1EJSPlaw/5fEZRGY9BANBCNd1MtCc/+8NGxwcceMZDK8ugy4NL6uyr3VJkADBVOcCNt6jmEYdAAgrWiIifgyLw1179VH4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Den5F6Ehsk3USu0QwC84RekaCnuEfgX1OFIlauT9nTfSPfJt1R9OOmg/e57ItGBGd7R9GcTawN9UjRWSWvgGrGuSw+R0HZKwGLiBij/7Au1jTqDHlWYP15aBl+HrxQTdtupjh6/sidgw3Y+Jmuhap1E3DkScdOHgT4aXjAiV0b4= Original-Received: by 10.115.22.1 with SMTP id z1mr2767136wai.48.1203905582854; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:13:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.115.72.13 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:13:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90334 Archived-At: On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Takashi Hiromatsu wrote: > For me, You meant that libxpm.dll > has advances in stability and compatibility area. No. I mean that Jason builds it, so we know it is compatible with the binary distribution (they are presumably built with the same compiler, for example), and it works OK. But I've been using xpm4.dll until now and I've never seen any ill effect either. > Ofcourse they also want to use more stable > DLLs, but not want to download huge package. The barebin package also includes it and it is 4.6 MB. Juanma