From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:43:15 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20071230122217.3CA84830B9A@snark.thyrsus.com> <4pd9g15e.fsf@blue.sea.net> <87r6g7z3m2.fsf@everybody.org> <87odbbngr8.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201221819 367 80.91.229.12 (25 Jan 2008 00:43:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 25 01:43:58 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JICfl-0006s7-OU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:43:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JICfL-0002z6-I6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:43:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JICfB-0002tX-Ue for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:43:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JICfA-0002rp-6b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:43:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JICf9-0002rS-SK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.181]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JICf9-0007dj-CZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so865235wah.10 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:43:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=O+0hGIE4XACFbf2f8a3yT+Y7wJ5nA103oLg6ROjim0Q=; b=lDmdopFTyhWZ/GAjNo3RwQ4cWYmmjFaEPNgsBp15EAtSSUehpt0ujVy3HAGqbRUYzhDTFe1p5WdDYYSUAjRehlSYklngVyGnu1wWTE0G59OETN6se/1a0iVP4Hme+cJG6Wr/0h7Bt3o6mp9vUh3CVDPulNoVTin+RMyQP6OAT4c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Hh/gIh9b4eMJLIPcbC70UD1oqBYOrOCYDP8J3XQLuy6T82BTleb4BERuJVmyyW2N8HZCx2dtywY+98S33lxNPU8Nc+WvOD2ECav+tHSygVmApO4M2cLhJddIOOw870cb6oLkbwVRGL5iZzsn9A7GMrK6Cq0IxOxXWCyjEdi5JvA= Original-Received: by 10.114.168.1 with SMTP id q1mr1541883wae.74.1201221795590; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:43:15 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.115.72.13 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:43:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87odbbngr8.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87459 Archived-At: On Jan 24, 2008 8:52 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > I would guess that in the time frame that Emacs is making the choice, > we'll see both Darcs 2 and GHC (the Glasgow Haskell Compiler used to > build Darcs) move their repos to Darcs 2. So don't rule Darcs out. I know this, I follow several Haskell lists, glasgow-haskell-users among them. My point wasn't about darcs shortcomings, but to stress than having "stand-alone binaries available and working *now* in Windows" will hardly be a deciding factor; not because I don't think it is important (I do), but because any reasonable candidate dVCS already works on Windows, to a lesser or greater extent. Juanma