From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 03:41:52 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20071230122217.3CA84830B9A@snark.thyrsus.com> <4pd9g15e.fsf@blue.sea.net> <874pd92ias.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87y7al11a1.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200883370 27723 80.91.229.12 (21 Jan 2008 02:42:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 02:42:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Miles Bader" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 21 03:43:09 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JGmcu-0006aT-58 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 03:43:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JGmcU-00030b-Qc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:42:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JGmbk-0002aB-9F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:41:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JGmbj-0002YE-3y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:41:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JGmbi-0002Xz-VP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:41:55 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.181]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JGmbi-000465-JM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:41:54 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so3411878wah.10 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:41:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=GVb+GaaSsGEbHwHN5LysLHYIbBQkWCy7pNVODdhWaf4=; b=x+eQhU/jIto1GpvdbVo0GfHPXnib9OS7bg9QRb6ctclkMiEuH/LTXGTwDLp/kM0dZQtYGw+6EM77UWY8sRNqyldFnwBTPSpf1FENtKr7nM4P+luddV7FwM+wm6rQNV6HJACxaEzOcx5/01CxbTZB49+gMomge7V3vyKeJRo6QPw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PquOA89Z+MUFIVzwj26v8ZlI3BjKZMdn9Q2QpWLOp9wlekGHY7wn8zJGT7siRKgD7qdV4RMLkCE6/9ZolvwDlTIchUGEH59NcEEgS9G8HywyUXlYhVbj8fNIaI5alUiEBFLNkKu3vXm2iJua7FmgJ1WiFS3htQvOXoYbl5cO2f0= Original-Received: by 10.115.55.1 with SMTP id h1mr3280827wak.69.1200883312787; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:41:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.115.72.13 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:41:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87164 Archived-At: On Jan 21, 2008 3:11 AM, Miles Bader wrote: > Many of the regular developers on this list appear to have a great deal > more experience with both (dVCS tools and Emacs development) than Eric > does... Yes. Perhaps that's why Eric asked for collaborators and reviewers for his paper... But, really. I haven't said we should take Eric's word as gospel [1]. I've just said we should wait and read what he writes. It seems common courtesy, as it is him who brought the issue of Emacs development tools back from oblivion (this time), and the only one who seems to be investing time. Juanma [1] I don't usually agree with 10% of what Eric says. The last time I read something by him I could fully enjoy was "A Guide to the Mazes of Menace", the Nethack guidebook. But that does not mean I don't appreciate the energy he's throwing at this.