From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:17:10 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20071230122217.3CA84830B9A@snark.thyrsus.com> <4pd9g15e.fsf@blue.sea.net> <874pd92ias.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87y7al11a1.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200860249 29099 80.91.229.12 (20 Jan 2008 20:17:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Miles Bader" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 20 21:17:48 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JGgbx-0001B5-Fx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:17:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JGgbY-0000Qt-3c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:17:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JGgbU-0000Ql-6s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:17:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JGgbS-0000QU-S2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:17:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JGgbS-0000QR-MR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:17:14 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.178]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JGgbS-0003oS-KE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:17:14 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so3236614wah.10 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:17:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=XRq6hfPpi8C/GDgZRCyA67LE5x29UH9j6jJhXVbiFv4=; b=KraXQdq9lehW6Sx8huDfW2anWa78c533R0kiqt3pxhjR3RyXHrzUIupGYTa9PCVfRlJGnUDu60qFZLeFlDVzvaQcyE/Tucvc72iU2MQDHuJAaRL7JNcCqSc1Br3LUCkhtku5vOW6bX2cqf7C/zqJNlGZ9MYq54ipr4QY9emdKZE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bkRGGOhVidQeK/DP22P0zAYWT5ulFIxCXCG+PeiqrvEH4I99DHbWoEBaJloanzfPHVjZMopyXw0iEI+xh+Rxj4KzSWoDazWFRZ2X5xAbh5Z8gmGZLrr5VPun8L//cXHLOpBLzOy6sWQREeUl5wv+QXhNfvCqfr20+VBBxl9c+4w= Original-Received: by 10.114.81.1 with SMTP id e1mr4489962wab.11.1200860230790; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:17:10 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.115.72.13 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:17:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87y7al11a1.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87122 Archived-At: On Jan 20, 2008 7:03 AM, Miles Bader wrote: > Yes, obviously in the long run, the msys git port will probably be > preferable to the majority of developers. What you say above seems to > indicate it's further along than I realized. > > > That's not to say that git it is preferable over mercurial, however. > > Let's first read Eric's article. > > When Eric finishes his "article", it will be something to consider, but > please don't give the impression that it will be some kind of definitive > statement on the issue. Eric, besides having rather obvious lack of > experience with many of these systems, has already shown clear biases. > It's very hard for even somebody trying hard to be objective to do a > good job of such a comparison. > > -Miles > > -- > I'd rather be consing. > -- Juanma