From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unused local variables Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:26:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87wss1qd9e.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <20071130.092322.193982611.kazu@iij.ad.jp> <20071130.182726.126856507.kazu@iij.ad.jp> <85r6i812aq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85hcj4117d.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1196418409 31037 80.91.229.12 (30 Nov 2007 10:26:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 10:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=B1=B1=E6=9C=AC=E5=92=8C=E5=BD=A6_Kazu_Yamamoto?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "David Kastrup" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 30 11:26:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iy35C-0006pG-Qf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:26:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iy34w-0003sl-SG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:26:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Iy34q-0003rO-Pi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:26:32 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Iy34p-0003ph-Gq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:26:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iy34o-0003pa-N2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:26:31 -0500 Original-Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.190]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Iy34o-0000Mo-5i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:26:30 -0500 Original-Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c27so2387257rvf for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:26:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=XGyppiDQ0+mOB626BKTrTaX342mS7G4fQaed85FWuRI=; b=GaXyPHHfGPILF/sudSYw1FU7dLVPNHQYqZ9sfshNJ0GAkhAl8dNKJYH7mw8ostq2uIKuDxIBI4k9u3qoexWIzXQod8CPQJgxlQ1yHRhj2XKeMeqqrbq8CXzYA3Dz34R0CNY/9HH5W1/TRkSJCjpGzvHuxzPIwa4POV4PGWlI4q0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BNfYgrR2m6JhejE+alYJ2mLEFMWgmw0wQ1tfNvsi7r/g+hAsuIDEk46Tf6KLz79N5zKuy6JhSg5PjOvtRtZg6HOD3XVncG2UkFOyFcC1syll1gARubw/XrzFrqvdKys36dHAFHy+AUu3zMpLr40SmmE7WKkU2VyIm2RCkfcWkP0= Original-Received: by 10.114.198.1 with SMTP id v1mr888628waf.1196418389129; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:26:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.168.11 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 02:26:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <85hcj4117d.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:84346 Archived-At: On Nov 30, 2007 11:23 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > > Now, I'm all for lexically scoped Lisp and (declare (special > > mydynamic-var)) and the like, but clearly that's not the route elisp > > is following. > > It is pretty much the current practice in Emacs code. Lexical scoping? Or are you purposefully misinterpreting the phrase you quoted? Juanma