From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Juanma Barranquero" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "simplifications" Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:54:24 +0100 Message-ID: References: <86ejem1pig.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <861wam1m8m.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86sl32zaqy.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <86oddqz9ge.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195476895 10589 80.91.229.12 (19 Nov 2007 12:54:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Miles Bader To: "David Kastrup" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 19 13:55:01 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iu69G-0007DK-0A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:54:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iu692-00058U-Cq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:54:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Iu68z-00058B-9Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:54:29 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Iu68x-00057u-ON for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:54:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iu68x-00057r-M2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:54:27 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.180]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Iu68x-0005sQ-22 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:54:27 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so1971168wah for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:54:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Wqp2gJKEWv6wRjJIcKXg0YZlT3GyrXQIH6UbqBK5/II=; b=HMKL5O+rs/sM7Fnefr/SY5s/uU569/1RXBWQfocO8riLnMHP6SUkciLltcVpLljM8nBwDBlgnmbQp0I+Fm3cPgGjENTAyDzDm//XnovSJpaTJzI8ERLvzjgppRNnmL0KYziMyZfsIk2RIZh9uvFq/jJ/udPg/kndfSlc9LKs+r0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UMJH9PKmD6/N/0NQSs4ID6/4n2UF/8yy3y3/uur353ccQU3JzQACyJrKCJyuT3OLat7Is4CT2RTo6PITSSLH1tbQR9xk7TPiGdLkDZEICwWyRZ1qDmv8iduK1OIU+V5mi3OLqbLHlUxMEiGoYZq2Bx7V4CxO0X1TcmS9T4sRSDA= Original-Received: by 10.114.154.1 with SMTP id b1mr669079wae.1195476864325; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:54:24 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.114.168.11 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:54:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <86oddqz9ge.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83647 Archived-At: On Nov 19, 2007 1:49 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > I am afraid that you are really too eager to interpret my mails as a > personal critique of you and this particular change. I ask you about definitions, and suddenly I'm "eager to interpret [...] emails as a personal critique". Curious. > But it is not the first such change > I see, and I would prefer to see changes in the byte compiler that > would make such changes a no-brainer, where one does not have to weigh > code efficiency vs. readability. Then perhaps these kinds of changes, in the trunk, will be useful by furthering the relevance of the issue. Juanma